Skip to content

Conversation

@ArturT
Copy link
Member

@ArturT ArturT commented Jan 17, 2025

  • Clarify Generate code coverage reports for jest
  • Add Missing Jest coverage data to troubleshooting

* Clarify Generate code coverage reports for jest
* Add  Missing Jest coverage data to troubleshooting
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we include a similar sentence in the other runners?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No because there are no examples of code coverage for Cypress & Vitest.

@ArturT ArturT merged commit 7803500 into main Jan 17, 2025
1 check passed
@ArturT ArturT deleted the improve-docs branch January 17, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants