Skip to content

Conversation

@cdunn314
Copy link
Contributor

This PR will add the foil analysis for BABY-1L-run-1 based on what's been done in BABY-1L-run-6.

@cdunn314
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've finished my changes. Note that only three check sources were used in the data analysis even though several more were measured because the results from those other measurements eight don't process well or seem to be measured under different settings. The results are basically the same as what we had hard-coded in the tritium-model previously.

Copy link
Member

@RemDelaporteMathurin RemDelaporteMathurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Just checking, is this ok for detection efficiency? 20%

This seems high compared to the efficiencies for run 6

@cdunn314
Copy link
Contributor Author

image Just checking, is this ok for detection efficiency? 20%

This seems high compared to the efficiencies for run 6

These check sources were measured right up against the detectors instead of at a distance of 4 inches, leading to higher uncertainty and more double counting, but also higher efficiency. So yes, this is expected.

@RemDelaporteMathurin RemDelaporteMathurin merged commit adbbd8d into LIBRA-project:main Jul 24, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants