Skip to content

Conversation

@pl-ghost
Copy link
Contributor

@pl-ghost pl-ghost commented Mar 5, 2025

This is automated addition of created checkpoints with the latest lightning release!

@pl-ghost pl-ghost requested a review from lantiga as a code owner March 5, 2025 11:06
@pl-ghost pl-ghost added checkpointing Related to checkpointing pl Generic label for PyTorch Lightning package tests labels Mar 5, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

⛈️ Required checks status: Has failure 🔴

Warning
This job will need to be re-run to merge your PR. If you do not have write access to the repository, you can ask Lightning-AI/lai-frameworks to re-run it. If you push a new commit, all of CI will re-trigger.

Groups summary

🔴 pytorch_lightning: Tests workflow
Check ID Status
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.9, 2.1, oldest) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.10, 2.1) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.11, 2.2.2) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.11, 2.3) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.4.1) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-20.04, lightning, 3.9, 2.1, oldest) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-20.04, lightning, 3.10, 2.1) failure
pl-cpu (ubuntu-20.04, lightning, 3.11, 2.2.2) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-20.04, lightning, 3.11, 2.3) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-22.04, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.4.1) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-22.04, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.9, 2.1, oldest) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.10, 2.1) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.11, 2.2.2) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.11, 2.3) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.4.1) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, lightning, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, pytorch, 3.9, 2.1) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-20.04, pytorch, 3.9, 2.1) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, pytorch, 3.9, 2.1) success
pl-cpu (macOS-14, pytorch, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success
pl-cpu (ubuntu-22.04, pytorch, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success
pl-cpu (windows-2022, pytorch, 3.12.7, 2.5.1) success

These checks are required after the changes to tests/legacy/back-compatible-versions.txt.


Thank you for your contribution! 💜

Note
This comment is automatically generated and updates for 60 minutes every 180 seconds. If you have any other questions, contact carmocca for help.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79%. Comparing base (1f5add3) to head (1b8878f).
Report is 117 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1f5add3) and HEAD (1b8878f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2694 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (1f5add3) HEAD (1b8878f)
gpu 2 0
pytest 314 0
lightning 468 17
cpu 623 23
python3.9 156 6
lightning_fabric 79 0
python3.10 78 2
python3.11 155 6
python3.12.7 234 9
pytorch2.1 117 8
pytest-full 311 23
pytorch_lightning 78 6
pytorch2.3 38 3
pytorch2.2.2 39 3
pytorch2.4.1 39 3
pytorch2.5.1 78 6
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #20616     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage      88%      79%     -9%     
=========================================
  Files         267      264      -3     
  Lines       23366    23311     -55     
=========================================
- Hits        20475    18364   -2111     
- Misses       2891     4947   +2056     

@pl-ghost pl-ghost force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 660223f to 1b8878f Compare March 8, 2025 07:47
@pl-ghost pl-ghost changed the title Adding test for legacy checkpoint created with 2.5.1rc0 Adding test for legacy checkpoint created with 2.5.1rc1 Mar 8, 2025
@Borda Borda closed this Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

checkpointing Related to checkpointing pl Generic label for PyTorch Lightning package tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants