Skip to content

Conversation

@LinuxSuRen
Copy link
Owner

We highly recommend you read the contributor's documentation before starting the review process especially since this is your first contribution to this project.

It was updated on 2024/5/27

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2025

There are 1 test cases, failed count 0:

Name Average Max Min Count Error
9.886111ms 10.54519ms 9.396278ms 3 0

Reported by api-testing.

w.Write([]byte(err.Error()))
}
if err == nil {
w.Write(data)

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Reflected cross-site scripting Medium

Cross-site scripting vulnerability due to
user-provided value
.
Cross-site scripting vulnerability due to user-provided value.

Copilot Autofix

AI 9 months ago

To fix the reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability, we need to ensure that any user-controlled data is properly sanitized or escaped before being written to the HTTP response. In this case, we can use the html.EscapeString function from the html package to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the data variable before writing it to the response.

Suggested changeset 1
pkg/mock/in_memory.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/pkg/mock/in_memory.go b/pkg/mock/in_memory.go
--- a/pkg/mock/in_memory.go
+++ b/pkg/mock/in_memory.go
@@ -40,2 +40,3 @@
     "github.com/gorilla/mux"
+    "html"
 )
@@ -353,3 +354,4 @@
     if err == nil {
-        w.Write(data)
+        escapedData := html.EscapeString(string(data))
+        w.Write([]byte(escapedData))
     } else {
EOF
@@ -40,2 +40,3 @@
"github.com/gorilla/mux"
"html"
)
@@ -353,3 +354,4 @@
if err == nil {
w.Write(data)
escapedData := html.EscapeString(string(data))
w.Write([]byte(escapedData))
} else {
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.20% (target: -1.00%) 73.63% (target: 80.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (430d912) 18750 7841 41.82%
Head commit (a89ce37) 19087 (+337) 8020 (+179) 42.02% (+0.20%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#619) 383 282 73.63%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen requested a review from yuluo-yx as a code owner February 11, 2025 12:50
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen merged commit 4b4ee3a into master Feb 15, 2025
20 of 22 checks passed
@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen deleted the feat/mock-webhook-auth branch February 15, 2025 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants