fix: using the correct database when switch store

[LinuxSuRen]

We highly recommend you read the contributor's documentation before starting the review process especially since this is your first contribution to this project.

It was updated on 2024/5/27

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

There are 1 test cases, failed count 0:

Name	Average	Max	Min	Count	Error
	11.733539ms	13.09602ms	10.731804ms	3	0

Reported by api-testing.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.18% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅ (target: 80.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (06ca3e4)	20589	8091	39.30%
Head commit (a55e509)	20956 (+367)	8273 (+182)	39.48% (+0.18%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#779)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences