Skip to content

Fix Archivist service startup failure due to port conflict#1491

Open
LokiMetaSmith wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-archivist-port-conflict-16090273670481981710
Open

Fix Archivist service startup failure due to port conflict#1491
LokiMetaSmith wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-archivist-port-conflict-16090273670481981710

Conversation

@LokiMetaSmith
Copy link
Owner

The Archivist service was failing to start with [Errno 98] address already in use because the port was still occupied by a previous process (likely due to Nomad's raw_exec driver leaving orphaned processes or fast restarts).

This change updates the start_archivist.sh script to:

  1. Check if lsof is available.
  2. Use lsof to detect if ARCHIVIST_PORT is in use.
  3. If in use, forcefully kill (kill -9) the process(es) holding the port.
  4. Verify the port is free before proceeding.

This ensures the new uvicorn instance can bind to the port successfully.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16090273670481981710 started by @LokiMetaSmith

Added logic to `pipecatapp/start_archivist.sh` to check if `ARCHIVIST_PORT`
is in use using `lsof` and kill the owning process before starting `uvicorn`.
This resolves the `[Errno 98] address already in use` error observed during
deployments where previous instances were not correctly cleaned up.

Co-authored-by: LokiMetaSmith <5054116+LokiMetaSmith@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant