feat(component): added date input component #212
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DocsSite
participant LumexDateInput
participant TestSuite
User->>DocsSite: Navigates to DateInput documentation
DocsSite->>LumexDateInput: Renders component with various props
User->>LumexDateInput: Interacts (input, clear, focus, etc.)
LumexDateInput-->>DocsSite: Updates UI and state
TestSuite->>LumexDateInput: Runs automated tests for behaviors
LumexDateInput-->>TestSuite: Returns results (rendering, events, validation)
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor (1)
1-6: Component structure looks good, but documentation should be addedThe component correctly inherits from
LumexInputFieldBase<DateTime?>and overrides theBuildRenderTreemethod. The structure follows the pattern used in other Lumex components.Consider adding XML documentation comments to describe the component's purpose, properties, and usage to improve developer experience.
@namespace LumexUI +@* + * LumexDatePicker component provides a user-friendly date selection interface. + * It inherits from LumexInputFieldBase<DateTime?> to leverage common input field functionality. + *@ @inherits LumexInputFieldBase<DateTime?> @{ base.BuildRenderTree(__builder); }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs (1)
34-34: Consider adding ComponentStatus.New flagThe DatePicker component is correctly added to the ComponentsCategory in alphabetical order. However, if this is a newly added component, consider marking it with ComponentStatus.New as seen with other new components like LumexAvatar, LumexChip, etc.
- .Add( new( nameof( LumexDatePicker ) ) ) + .Add( new( nameof( LumexDatePicker ), ComponentStatus.New ) )docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor (1)
1-5: Component looks good but has a naming inconsistencyThe component correctly uses the InteractiveWebAssembly render mode and properly references the example component. However, there's a potential naming inconsistency in the code snippet reference.
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Datepicker.Code.DebounceDelay")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DatePicker.Code.DebounceDelay")">The snippet name uses "Datepicker" (lowercase 'p') while other files in the PR use "DatePicker" (uppercase 'P'). Consider standardizing the naming convention for consistency.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Variants.razor (1)
6-7: Consider consistent capitalization in labels.The label "date" is lowercase here, while in the second LumexDatePicker (lines 9-11) it's capitalized as "Date". For consistency, consider capitalizing both labels unless this difference is intentional to demonstrate specific behavior.
- <LumexDatePicker Variant="@variant" - Label="date" /> + <LumexDatePicker Variant="@variant" + Label="Date" />docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Sizes.razor (1)
1-17: Consider enhancing the responsive layoutThe grid layout is currently set to
grid-cols-1which creates a single-column layout regardless of screen size. For better space utilization on larger screens, consider using responsive grid columns.-<div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4"> +<div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 gap-4">This would display the different sized date pickers side by side on larger screens, making better use of horizontal space while maintaining a single column on mobile.
src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor.cs (1)
20-31: Consider conditional focus behavior revisitThe component forces focus (
Focused = true) when the component is neither disabled nor readonly. This might cause unexpected behavior for users if the date picker immediately receives focus when the page loads.Consider making the auto-focus behavior optional through a parameter:
public partial class LumexDatePicker : LumexInputFieldBase<DateTime?> { private readonly InputType _type = InputType.DateTime; + + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets a value indicating whether the date picker should automatically receive focus. + /// </summary> + [Parameter] + public bool AutoFocus { get; set; } = false; /// <inheritdoc /> protected override void OnParametersSet() { SetInputType( _type.ToDescription() ); - if( !Disabled && !ReadOnly ) + if( AutoFocus && !Disabled && !ReadOnly ) { Focused = true; } base.OnParametersSet(); }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor (4)
7-8: Misleading property name for date validation.The property name
EmailErrorMessageis being used for date validation errors, which is confusing and may lead to maintenance issues.- ErrorMessage="@_userValidator.EmailErrorMessage" - Invalid="@(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(_userValidator.EmailErrorMessage))" + ErrorMessage="@_userValidator.DateErrorMessage" + Invalid="@(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(_userValidator.DateErrorMessage))"
36-39: Misleading property name for date validation.The property name
EmailErrorMessageis used to store validation errors for the Date property, causing confusion.- _userValidator.EmailErrorMessage = result.Errors + _userValidator.DateErrorMessage = result.Errors .Where(failure => failure.PropertyName == nameof(User.Date)) .Select(failure => failure.ErrorMessage) .FirstOrDefault();
43-43: Misleading property name for date validation.The property name
EmailErrorMessageis cleared when validation passes, but it's used for date validation.- _userValidator.EmailErrorMessage = null; + _userValidator.DateErrorMessage = null;
54-54: Misleading property name for date validation.The property name should reflect that it's for date validation errors, not email errors.
- public string? EmailErrorMessage { get; set; } + public string? DateErrorMessage { get; set; }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/CustomStyles.razor (1)
9-13: Consider using a more type-safe approach for icon size.The icon size is defined as a string wrapped in a
new()constructor, which might be less type-safe than using a numeric value if the component supports it.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/StartEndContent.razor (5)
5-18: The example demonstrates start content but may cause confusion with the example labels.The labels "Website", "Search", and "Email" don't conceptually align with date pickers. While this is showing how to use the StartContent feature, the context of the examples might confuse users about appropriate use cases for date pickers.
Consider using more date-relevant labels such as "Meeting Date", "Appointment", or "Event Date" to better represent real-world date picker use cases.
30-43: EndContent examples use identical labels as StartContent examples.Using the same labels (Website, Search, Email) across different example sections may make it difficult for users to distinguish between them when referring to specific examples in documentation or discussions.
Consider adding suffixes to differentiate the examples, such as "Website (End)", "Search (End)", etc., or using entirely different but still contextually appropriate labels.
6-7: All date pickers use the same date format placeholder without localization consideration.Each date picker uses "dd/MM/yyyy" as the placeholder format, which is a European date format that might not be intuitive for users in regions using different formats (like MM/dd/yyyy in the US).
Consider showing various date format examples or including a note about format localization options. For example:
- Placeholder="dd/MM/yyyy" + Placeholder="@System.Globalization.CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.DateTimeFormat.ShortDatePattern"Or demonstrate multiple formats across the examples to show flexibility:
- Placeholder="dd/MM/yyyy" + Placeholder="dd/MM/yyyy" @* European format *@For another example:
- Placeholder="dd/MM/yyyy" + Placeholder="MM/dd/yyyy" @* US format *@Also applies to: 11-12, 16-17, 31-32, 36-37, 41-42, 56-57, 62-63, 68-69
1-79: The example doesn't demonstrate binding or validation functionality.While this example effectively shows the visual aspects of the LumexDatePicker with various content configurations, it doesn't demonstrate how to bind to a model, handle value changes, or implement validation.
Consider enhancing the example to include:
- A simple binding example:
@bind-Value="selectedDate"- Basic validation showcase
- An event handler for date changes:
OnValueChange="HandleDateChanged"This would provide more complete usage guidance for developers.
1-114: This example provides good visual demonstration but lacks documentation comments.The file effectively shows various configurations of the LumexDatePicker but doesn't include any explanatory comments to help developers understand the purpose of each section or when to use specific configurations.
Consider adding brief comments before each section explaining the use case or scenario where that particular configuration would be appropriate. For example:
@* Use StartContent to provide context before the date input, useful for prefixing with icons or context clues *@
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs(2 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/DatePicker.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Variants.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/_Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/InputType.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor.cs(1 hunks)tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DatePicker/DatePickerTests.razor(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs (1)
src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor.cs (1)
LumexDatePicker(16-65)
🔇 Additional comments (54)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor (1)
1-5: Documentation code looks good!The preview code correctly utilizes InteractiveWebAssembly rendermode and references the appropriate example component for the disabled date picker. This approach is consistent with other component documentation in the library.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor (1)
1-5: Documentation code looks good!The preview code for StartEndContent is properly implemented with InteractiveWebAssembly rendermode and references the appropriate example component. This maintains consistency with the documentation style used throughout the library.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor (1)
1-5: Documentation code looks good!The usage preview code is correctly set up with InteractiveWebAssembly rendermode and references the appropriate example component, maintaining consistency with other component documentation in the library.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor (1)
1-5: Well-structured preview component for date picker sizesThe component correctly uses InteractiveWebAssembly rendering mode which is appropriate for a date picker that requires client-side interactivity. The implementation follows the established documentation pattern separating the example implementation from its code display.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Description.razor (1)
1-4: Good example of date picker with descriptionThis example effectively demonstrates setting up a LumexDatePicker with a descriptive helper text. The use of the European date format "dd/MM.yyyy" in the placeholder shows attention to internationalization concerns. The max-width constraint (max-w-xs) provides good guidance on layout control.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs (1)
70-70: Correctly added to API documentationThe component has been properly added to the ComponentsApiCategory, maintaining the same component ordering as in the main ComponentsCategory.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor (1)
1-5: Well-structured preview component for clear button functionalityThe component follows the consistent documentation pattern established in the project, using InteractiveWebAssembly for client-side behavior and separating the example implementation from its display. This approach to documenting the clear button functionality maintains good separation of concerns.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor (1)
1-5: Preview code implementation looks goodThe component correctly uses the InteractiveWebAssembly render mode and properly references the example component with its code snippet.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor (1)
1-5: Preview code implementation looks goodThe component correctly uses the InteractiveWebAssembly render mode and properly references the example component with its code snippet.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Required.razor (1)
1-4: Example implementation looks goodThe example demonstrates the required functionality of the LumexDatePicker component with appropriate properties. The max-width class ensures good UI presentation.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/_Radius.razor (2)
1-14: Grid layout implementation looks goodThe grid layout with responsive design (single column on small screens, two columns on medium and larger screens) provides a good user experience. The component correctly iterates through all radius options and displays them with appropriate labels.
16-23: Proper implementation of radius optionsThe code correctly defines and uses all available radius options in the array. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Variants.razor (2)
1-19: LGTM! Well-structured example for variants.The example clearly demonstrates the three variants of LumexDatePicker (Flat, Outlined, and Underlined) in a clean, responsive layout. Good use of flexbox for the layout and appropriate spacing between elements.
22-26: Good use of modern C# syntax.The use of collection expression syntax (introduced in C# 12) for array initialization is clean and modern.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured preview code setup.The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly used for client-side interactivity, and the PreviewCode wrapper properly references the corresponding example component.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor (2)
9-13: LGTM! Good use of custom preview styling.The gradient background and centered content provide an attractive showcase for the custom styles example.
1-14: Well-structured preview with appropriate interactive rendering.The component correctly uses InteractiveWebAssembly for client-side rendering and properly references the example component with custom styling applied to the preview container.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor (2)
1-19: LGTM! Well-structured example for label placements.The example clearly demonstrates the two label placement options (Inside and Outside) in a clean, responsive layout. Good use of consistent capitalization for all labels.
22-25: Good use of modern C# syntax.The use of collection expression syntax for array initialization is clean and modern.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Disabled.razor (1)
1-4: Well-structured example demonstrating disabled state.The example clearly showcases the
LumexDatePickercomponent with the disabled state. The property configuration is correctly set with an appropriate label and placeholder showing the expected date format. The max-width class ensures the component has a reasonable size on the page.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Colors.razor (2)
1-15: Well-implemented responsive grid for theme color variants.The responsive grid layout properly adjusts from single column on mobile to two columns on medium screens and larger. Each date picker is properly configured with its theme color and displays a helpful label underneath to identify the color being demonstrated.
17-27: Complete implementation of theme color options.The code block correctly defines all available theme colors for the component, ensuring comprehensive documentation of the styling options available to users.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Usage.razor (1)
1-6: Clear demonstration of basic component usage.The example effectively showcases two variations of the
LumexDatePickercomponent with a responsive flex layout. The first example shows minimal configuration with just a label, while the second demonstrates how to add a placeholder. This provides users with a good starting point for implementing the component.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor (2)
1-13: Effective demonstration of debounce functionality with value feedback.The example properly configures the
LumexDatePickerwith debounce functionality using the appropriate properties. The real-time display of the selected value below the component provides excellent feedback to users, demonstrating how the component behaves with delayed input processing.
15-17: Correctly defined nullable DateTime value.The private variable
_valueis appropriately defined as a nullable DateTime to properly handle the case when no date is selected, which is consistent with the component's intended usage.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor (1)
1-5: Well-structured preview code for DatePicker variantsThe implementation properly uses the
InteractiveWebAssemblyrender mode and follows the project's pattern for showcasing component variants through thePreviewCodecomponent with the appropriate example reference.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ReadOnly.razor (1)
1-4: ReadOnly example implementation looks goodThe example correctly demonstrates the ReadOnly functionality of the DatePicker component with appropriate additional properties:
- The
ReadOnlyflag is set to true- A clear label is provided
- The placeholder shows the expected date format
- The sizing class constrains the width appropriately
src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/InputType.cs (1)
60-66: DateTime enum value properly addedThe InputType enum has been correctly extended with the DateTime type, including proper documentation and Description attribute. The trailing comma on the Color type follows proper enum syntax convention for extensibility.
However, I notice the Description attribute uses "date" while the type is named "DateTime". This slight inconsistency might be intentional for HTML input compatibility, but it's worth confirming.
Is the description "date" (rather than "datetime") intentional for HTML compatibility?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor (1)
1-5: Well-structured error message preview codeThe implementation properly uses the
InteractiveWebAssemblyrender mode and follows the project's pattern for showcasing error handling through thePreviewCodecomponent with the appropriate example reference.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Sizes.razor (1)
19-25: LGTM - Size array implementationThe sizes array is well-structured and provides a good demonstration of the available size options for the DatePicker component.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor (1)
1-6: LGTM - Preview code setup for Colors exampleThe file correctly sets up an interactive WebAssembly preview for the DatePicker Colors example. The
InteractiveWebAssemblyrender mode is appropriately used, and the component references the necessary examples.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ClearButton.razor (2)
1-14: LGTM - ClearButton implementationThe DatePicker with the ClearButton feature is well implemented. It demonstrates the
Clearableproperty and theOnClearedevent handler correctly.
15-18: LGTM - State variables declarationThe private state variables for tracking the text message and date value are appropriately declared.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Required.razor (1)
1-6: LGTM - Preview code setup for Required exampleThe file correctly sets up an interactive WebAssembly preview for the DatePicker Required example. The implementation follows the same pattern as other preview code files, which is good for consistency.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/Description.razor (1)
1-5: LGTM! Component structure follows project patterns.The component correctly uses the InteractiveWebAssembly render mode and properly references the Description example component. The code structure aligns with other preview code components in the project.
src/LumexUI/Components/DatePicker/LumexDatePicker.razor.cs (3)
16-18: LGTM! Class extends the appropriate base class.The
LumexDatePickercorrectly inherits fromLumexInputFieldBase<DateTime?>, which is appropriate for an input field handling nullable DateTime values.
33-56: LGTM! Comprehensive date parsing implementation.The date parsing logic is well-structured with a clear hierarchy of parsing attempts:
- First checks for null/empty input
- Attempts strict parsing with round-trip format
- Falls back to culture-specific parsing
This provides good flexibility for users while maintaining precision.
58-64: LGTM! Format method provides consistent output.The
FormatValueAsStringmethod correctly uses the round-trip ("O") format with invariant culture, ensuring consistent serialization of dates.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor (2)
1-22: LGTM! Good demonstration of both binding approaches.The example effectively demonstrates two methods of binding:
- Two-way binding with
@bind-Value- Manual binding with separate
ValueandValueChangedpropertiesThis provides developers with clear patterns to follow.
24-32: LGTM! Example demonstrates the binding data flow.The code section properly initializes the variables and implements the value changed handler. Setting
_valueTwotoDateTime.UtcNowby default is a good practice to show a non-null initial state.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor (1)
1-5: LGTM! Component structure follows project patterns.The component correctly uses the InteractiveWebAssembly render mode and properly references the ReadOnly example component, following the project's documentation structure patterns.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/CustomStyles.razor (2)
1-6: LGTM - Good implementation of a custom-styled DatePicker.The component is well-structured with appropriate custom styling and configuration.
15-32: LGTM - Well-structured custom styling.The custom styling implementation uses a clean approach with the
InputFieldSlotsclass and appropriate CSS classes.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/DatePicker.razor (2)
1-157: LGTM - Comprehensive documentation for the DatePicker component.The documentation is well-structured with clear sections explaining all aspects of the component. Each feature is properly documented with examples and descriptions.
158-216: LGTM - Well-organized code-behind for documentation.The code-behind properly initializes all necessary structures for the documentation, including headings, slots, and API components.
tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DatePicker/DatePickerTests.razor (7)
10-25: LGTM - Good test setup and basic rendering tests.The test initialization and basic rendering tests are well-implemented, ensuring the component renders correctly.
27-78: LGTM - Thorough testing of UI elements and error states.These tests comprehensively verify the rendering of various UI elements and proper handling of error states.
80-151: LGTM - Good coverage of attributes and clear button functionality.The tests properly verify the disabled attribute, input type, and clear button behavior with both mouse and keyboard events.
153-199: LGTM - Well-tested callback and focus behavior.The tests thoroughly verify the callback invocation on clear and focus behavior with different component states.
201-249: LGTM - Good testing of value change behavior.The tests properly verify the value updating behavior with different input modes (OnInput vs OnChange).
251-294: LGTM - Well-implemented debounce testing.The tests correctly verify immediate value changes without debounce and delayed changes with debounce, using appropriate assertions and delays.
296-306: LGTM - Good validation of invalid configuration.The test correctly verifies that an exception is thrown when an invalid combination of properties is used.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/StartEndContent.razor (2)
101-103: The content divs are marked as pointer-events-none which may impact accessibility.While this prevents the divs from capturing mouse events, it might affect how screen readers interact with them. Additionally, these examples use text that isn't semantically related to dates (like ".org" or "@doe.com").
Verify that these examples maintain accessibility compliance, particularly for screen reader users. Consider using more date-related examples such as calendar icons, date format indicators, or validation states.
Also applies to: 106-108, 111-113
84-85: Size property of LumexIcon uses a string wrapped in a new() call.The syntax
Size="@new("20")"appears unusual. If the Size property expects a string, it would be simpler to useSize="20". If it's expecting an object, the implementation details may need review.Verify if this pattern is necessary or if it could be simplified to
Size="20"directly. If this is a convention in the codebase, consider documenting why this approach is used.Also applies to: 90-91, 96-97
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/ClearButton.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Hi, |
|
Hey @sikelio, First of all, thank you for submitting this PR—and sorry for not giving it the attention it deserves. I was off for a week. I’ll review it as soon as possible. |
|
No problem take your time. Hope you could rest |
|
Hey @sikelio, Thanks again for this PR! I’m still unable to fully focus on Lumex and this PR due to some side projects. However, I did a quick review of the changes and wanted to point out a couple of things:
Thank you for following the established patterns (demo pages/components/tests). I really appreciate it! |
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Colors.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Description.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Disabled.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Sizes.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/Variants.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DatePicker/Examples/_Radius.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Hey @desmondinho |
|
Hi, sorry I didn't find time yet, i'll try my best |
sikelio
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor.cs (2)
16-16: Consider locale-aware date formatting.The hardcoded date format
"yyyy-MM-dd"follows ISO 8601 standard which is good for HTML date inputs, but consider documenting this constraint or potentially making it configurable for different scenarios.This format works well with HTML5 date inputs, but consider adding documentation about the format constraint.
36-40: Simplify validation logic.Since only
InputDateType.Dateis supported currently, the validation check may be unnecessary complexity. Consider removing this parameter until other date types are actually implemented.- if( DateInputType != InputDateType.Date ) - { - throw new InvalidOperationException( - $"LumexDateInput does not currently support {DateInputType}. Only Date is implemented." ); - }Alternatively, if you plan to support other types soon, keep the validation but improve the error message.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (39)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs(2 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/DateInput.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Variants.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/_Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/InputDateType.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor.cs(1 hunks)tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DateInput/DateInputTests.razor(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (31)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Disabled.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Required.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Description.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ReadOnly.razor
- src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/InputDateType.cs
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Sizes.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor
- src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Required.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Colors.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Usage.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Description.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/_Radius.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/Variants.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/StartEndContent.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/DateInput.razor
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DateInput/DateInputTests.razor (1)
Learnt from: desmondinho
PR: LumexUI/lumexui#159
File: src/LumexUI.Motion/LumexUI.Motion.csproj:9-11
Timestamp: 2025-01-30T00:22:33.596Z
Learning: LumexUI.Motion is planned to be distributed as a separate NuGet package with its own test coverage, hence the assembly-wide coverage exclusion in the project.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor.cs (1)
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs (1)
SetInputType(265-268)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor (1)
15-15: Excellent improvement for maintainability!Using
Enum.GetValues<LabelPlacement>()instead of a hardcoded array ensures that all possible label placement options are automatically included in the examples. This approach is future-proof and aligns well with the dynamic enumeration pattern used in the new DateInput examples.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor (1)
1-32: LGTM - Clean demonstration of two-way binding patterns.The example effectively demonstrates both
@bind-Valueand explicitValue/ValueChangedpatterns for two-way data binding. The implementation is correct and follows Blazor best practices.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/CustomStyles.razor (1)
1-35: LGTM - Excellent demonstration of custom styling capabilities.The example showcases the flexible styling system using
InputFieldSlotsand theElementClassfluent builder pattern. The implementation is well-structured and demonstrates advanced customization options effectively.src/LumexUI/Components/DateInput/LumexDateInput.razor.cs (1)
48-51: Question the automatic focus behavior.Setting
Focused = trueautomatically when the component is not disabled or read-only could interfere with the user experience and accessibility. This might cause unexpected focus behavior, especially when multiple date inputs are on the same page.Consider whether this automatic focusing is necessary or if it should be controlled by the consumer of the component.
tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DateInput/DateInputTests.razor (7)
10-17: Test setup looks good with proper service registration.The constructor properly sets up the required dependencies including TwMerge and JS interop mocking for input validation.
19-25: Basic rendering test is well-structured.Simple smoke test to verify the component renders without throwing exceptions.
62-66: Good test logic for conditional error message rendering.The test correctly verifies that error messages are only displayed when the component state is invalid, not just when an ErrorMessage is provided.
130-151: Excellent keyboard interaction testing.The parameterized test properly validates that the clear button only responds to Enter and Space keys, which follows accessibility best practices.
269-294: Well-implemented async debounce testing.The test properly validates the debounce functionality with multiple time checks and uses
WaitForAssertionfor the final assertion, which is the correct approach for testing asynchronous behavior in Bunit.
296-306: Good validation of invalid configuration.Testing that the component throws an exception when debounce is used with OnChange behavior is important for preventing misconfiguration.
211-223: DateTime precision handling is correct.The logic to truncate DateTime precision by removing sub-second ticks is appropriate for date input components that typically don't handle millisecond precision.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ClearButton.razor
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DateInput/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Hi |
|
Hey @sikelio , Could you please recreate this PR, so it targets main branch? |
|
Hey @desmondinho No problem, I'll do it when I get back from work. |
@sikelio Thank you! I’ll finally have time to review this properly, as this component will likely be part of the next release. |
|
Hey @desmondinho i've created the PR ^^ #250 |
The best! Thanks :) |
2 participants
Description
Implementation of Date Input component.
Closes #192
What's been done?
LumexDateInputcomponentLumexDateInputdocumentionLumexDateInputtestsChecklist
Additional Notes
None
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests