Skip to content

Conversation

@MBkkt
Copy link
Owner

@MBkkt MBkkt commented Jan 9, 2025

No description provided.

@MBkkt MBkkt closed this Jan 9, 2025
@MBkkt MBkkt reopened this Jan 9, 2025
MBkkt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
…erver (llvm#148774)

Summary:
There was a deadlock was introduced by [PR
llvm#146441](llvm#146441) which changed
`CurrentThreadIsPrivateStateThread()` to
`CurrentThreadPosesAsPrivateStateThread()`. This change caused the
execution path in
[`ExecutionContextRef::SetTargetPtr()`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/10b5558b61baab59c7d3dff37ffdf0861c0cc67a/lldb/source/Target/ExecutionContext.cpp#L513)
to now enter a code block that was previously skipped, triggering
[`GetSelectedFrame()`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/10b5558b61baab59c7d3dff37ffdf0861c0cc67a/lldb/source/Target/ExecutionContext.cpp#L522)
which leads to a deadlock.

Thread 1 gets m_modules_mutex in
[`ModuleList::AppendImpl`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp#L218),
Thread 3 gets m_language_runtimes_mutex in
[`GetLanguageRuntime`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp#L1501),
but then Thread 1 waits for m_language_runtimes_mutex in
[`GetLanguageRuntime`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp#L1501)
while Thread 3 waits for m_modules_mutex in
[`ScanForGNUstepObjCLibraryCandidate`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Plugins/LanguageRuntime/ObjC/GNUstepObjCRuntime/GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp#L57).

This fixes the deadlock by adding a scoped block around the mutex lock
before the call to the notifier, and moved the notifier call outside of
the mutex-guarded section. The notifier call
[`NotifyModuleAdded`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp#L1810)
should be thread-safe, since the module should be added to the
`ModuleList` before the mutex is released, and the notifier doesn't
modify the module list further, and the call is operates on local state
and the `Target` instance.

### Deadlocked Thread backtraces:
```
* thread llvm#3, name = 'dbg.evt-handler', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
  * frame #0: 0x00007f2f1e2973dc libc.so.6`futex_wait(private=0, expected=2, futex_word=0x0000563786bd5f40) at    futex-internal.h:146:13
   /*... a bunch of mutex related bt ... */    
   liblldb.so.21.0git`std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard(this=0x00007f2f0f1927b0, __m=0x0000563786bd5f40) at std_mutex.h:229:19
    frame llvm#8: 0x00007f2f27946eb7 liblldb.so.21.0git`ScanForGNUstepObjCLibraryCandidate(modules=0x0000563786bd5f28, TT=0x0000563786bd5eb8) at GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp:60:41
    frame llvm#9: 0x00007f2f27946c80 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::GNUstepObjCRuntime::CreateInstance(process=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp:87:8
    frame llvm#10: 0x00007f2f2746fca5 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::LanguageRuntime::FindPlugin(process=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at LanguageRuntime.cpp:210:36
    frame llvm#11: 0x00007f2f2742c9e3 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::GetLanguageRuntime(this=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at Process.cpp:1516:9
    ...
    frame llvm#21: 0x00007f2f2750b5cc liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Thread::GetSelectedFrame(this=0x0000563785e064d0, select_most_relevant=DoNoSelectMostRelevantFrame) at Thread.cpp:274:48
    frame llvm#22: 0x00007f2f273f9957 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ExecutionContextRef::SetTargetPtr(this=0x00007f2f0f193778, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, adopt_selected=true) at ExecutionContext.cpp:525:32
    frame llvm#23: 0x00007f2f273f9714 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ExecutionContextRef::ExecutionContextRef(this=0x00007f2f0f193778, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, adopt_selected=true) at ExecutionContext.cpp:413:3
    frame llvm#24: 0x00007f2f270e80af liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Debugger::GetSelectedExecutionContext(this=0x0000563785d83bc0) at Debugger.cpp:1225:23
    frame llvm#25: 0x00007f2f271bb7fd liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Statusline::Redraw(this=0x0000563785d83f30, update=true) at Statusline.cpp:136:41
    ...
* thread #1, name = 'lldb', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
  * frame #0: 0x00007f2f1e2973dc libc.so.6`futex_wait(private=0, expected=2, futex_word=0x0000563785e1dd98) at futex-internal.h:146:13
   /*... a bunch of mutex related bt ... */    
   liblldb.so.21.0git`std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard(this=0x00007ffe62be0488, __m=0x0000563785e1dd98) at std_mutex.h:229:19
    frame llvm#8: 0x00007f2f2742c8d1 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::GetLanguageRuntime(this=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeC_plus_plus) at Process.cpp:1510:41
    frame llvm#9: 0x00007f2f2743c46f liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::ModulesDidLoad(this=0x0000563785e1d360, module_list=0x00007ffe62be06a0) at Process.cpp:6082:36
    ...
    frame llvm#13: 0x00007f2f2715cf03 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ModuleList::AppendImpl(this=0x0000563786bd5f28, module_sp=ptr = 0x563785cec560, use_notifier=true) at ModuleList.cpp:246:19
    frame llvm#14: 0x00007f2f2715cf4c liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(this=0x0000563786bd5f28, module_sp=ptr = 0x563785cec560, notify=true) at ModuleList.cpp:251:3
    ...
    frame llvm#19: 0x00007f2f274349b3 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::ConnectRemote(this=0x0000563785e1d360, remote_url=(Data = "connect://localhost:1234", Length = 24)) at Process.cpp:3250:9
    frame llvm#20: 0x00007f2f27411e0e liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Platform::DoConnectProcess(this=0x0000563785c59990, connect_url=(Data = "connect://localhost:1234", Length = 24), plugin_name=(Data = "gdb-remote", Length = 10), debugger=0x0000563785d83bc0, stream=0x00007ffe62be3128, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, error=0x00007ffe62be1ca0) at Platform.cpp:1926:23
```

## Test Plan:
Built a hello world a.out
Run server in one terminal:
```
~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb-server g :1234 a.out
```
Run client in another terminal
```
~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b hello.cc:3"
```

Before:
Client hangs indefinitely
```
~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b main"
(lldb) gdb-remote 1234

^C^C
```

After:
```
~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b hello.cc:3"
(lldb) gdb-remote 1234
Process 837068 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
    frame #0: 0x00007ffff7fe4a60
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_start:
->  0x7ffff7fe4a60 <+0>: movq   %rsp, %rdi
    0x7ffff7fe4a63 <+3>: callq  0x7ffff7fe5780 ; _dl_start at rtld.c:522:1

ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_dl_start_user:
    0x7ffff7fe4a68 <+0>: movq   %rax, %r12
    0x7ffff7fe4a6b <+3>: movl   0x18067(%rip), %eax ; _dl_skip_args
(lldb) b hello.cc:3
Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 15 at hello.cc:4:13, address = 0x00005555555551bf
(lldb) c
Process 837068 resuming
Process 837068 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
    frame #0: 0x00005555555551bf a.out`main at hello.cc:4:13
   1   	#include <iostream>
   2
   3   	int main() {
-> 4   	  std::cout << "Hello World" << std::endl;
   5   	  return 0;
   6   	}
```
MBkkt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
…lvm#152156)

With this new A320 in-order core, we follow adding the
FeatureUseFixedOverScalableIfEqualCost feature to A510 and A520
(llvm#132246), which reaps the same code generation benefits of preferring
fixed over scalable when the cost is equal.

So when we have:
```
void foo(float* a, float* b, float* dst, unsigned n) {
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
        dst[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
```

When compiling without the feature enabled, we get:
```
...
    ld1b    { z0.b }, p0/z, [x0, x10]
    ld1b    { z2.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10]
    add     x12, x0, x10
    ldr     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
    add     x12, x1, x10
    ldr     z3, [x12, #1, mul vl]
    fadd    z0.s, z2.s, z0.s
    add     x12, x2, x10
    fadd    z1.s, z3.s, z1.s
    dech    x11
    st1b    { z0.b }, p0, [x2, x10]
    incb    x10, all, mul llvm#2
    str     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
...
```

When compiling with, we get:
```
...
  	ldp	    q0, q1, [x12, #-16]
	ldp	    q2, q3, [x11, #-16]
	subs	x13, x13, llvm#8
	fadd	v0.4s, v2.4s, v0.4s
	fadd	v1.4s, v3.4s, v1.4s
	add	    x11, x11, llvm#32
	add	    x12, x12, llvm#32
	stp	    q0, q1, [x10, #-16]
	add	    x10, x10, llvm#32

...
```
MBkkt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
M68k's SETCC instruction (`scc`) distinctly fills the destination byte
with all 1s. If boolean contents are set to `ZeroOrOneBooleanContent`,
LLVM can mistakenly think the destination holds `0x01` instead of `0xff`
and emit broken code as a result. This change corrects the boolean
content type to `ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent`.

For example, this IR:

```llvm
define dso_local signext range(i8 0, 2) i8 @testBool(i32 noundef %a) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, 4660
  %. = zext i1 %cmp to i8
  ret i8 %.
}
```

would previously build as:

```asm
testBool:                               ; @testBool
	cmpi.l	llvm#4660, (4,%sp)
	seq	%d0
	and.l	llvm#255, %d0
	rts
```

Notice the `zext` is erroneously not clearing the low bits, and thus the
register returns with 255 instead of 1. This patch fixes the issue:

```asm
testBool:                               ; @testBool
	cmpi.l	llvm#4660, (4,%sp)
	seq	%d0
	and.l	#1, %d0
	rts
```

Most of the tests containing `scc` suffered from the same value error as
described above, so those tests have been updated to match the new
output (which also logically corrects them).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants