Skip to content

Conversation

@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

This is an example of how one would use LAPACK in post_process. It isn't intended to be merged; it is just a static example of how to do this.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.05128% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 43.79%. Comparing base (adcc0dd) to head (a1e9092).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/post_process/m_lapack_example.f90 81.08% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #939      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.71%   43.79%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          68       69       +1     
  Lines       18360    18399      +39     
  Branches     2292     2293       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         8026     8058      +32     
- Misses       8945     8951       +6     
- Partials     1389     1390       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sbryngelson sbryngelson deleted the lapack branch August 1, 2025 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant