Remove fortitude from workflow

[sbryngelson]

User description

deleted fortitude. pain to install for some users on macos

---

PR Type

Other

---

Description

• Remove fortitude linting tool from project

• Delete configuration file and workflow steps

• Update Python dependencies in pyproject.toml

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["fortitude tool"] --> B["configuration removal"]
  A --> C["workflow cleanup"]
  A --> D["dependency removal"]

Loading

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Configuration changes	.fortitude.toml Delete fortitude configuration file                                            .fortitude.toml Delete entire fortitude configuration file Remove check settings and file extensions +0/-4      lint-source.yml Remove fortitude from CI workflow                                                .github/workflows/lint-source.yml Remove fortitude linting workflow steps Delete source code checking commands +0/-6
Dependencies	pyproject.toml Remove fortitude dependency                                                            toolchain/pyproject.toml Remove fortitude-lint from dependencies list +0/-1

---

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the fortitude-lint dependency and associated linting workflow due to installation difficulties on macOS. The change simplifies the toolchain by eliminating a problematic dependency while retaining other code quality checks.

Key changes:

• Removed fortitude-lint from Python dependencies
• Eliminated the fortitude linting step from the CI workflow
• Deleted the fortitude configuration file

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
toolchain/pyproject.toml	Removed fortitude-lint from the dependencies list
.github/workflows/lint-source.yml	Removed the fortitude linting job from the CI workflow
.fortitude.toml	Deleted the entire fortitude configuration file

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Missed Duplicate Check Removal The workflow previously ran the fortitude check twice and enforced failure on findings; with fortitude removed, ensure an equivalent gate still exists (e.g., expand pylint/black checks or add alternative Fortran linting) so code quality doesn't silently regress. - name: Looking for raw directives run: | ! grep -iR '!\$acc\|!\$omp' --exclude="parallel_macros.fpp" --exclude="syscheck.fpp" ./src/*

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Make directive check failure actionable The raw directives check fails the job with a negated grep but provides no output to help debugging. Add a fallback to print matches when found to make failures actionable, and ensure grep returns zero when no files exist to avoid false failures. .github/workflows/lint-source.yml [31-33] - name: Initialize MFC run: ./mfc.sh init - name: Looking for raw directives run: | - ! grep -iR '!\$acc\|!\$omp' --exclude="parallel_macros.fpp" --exclude="syscheck.fpp" ./src/* + set -euo pipefail + if matches="$(grep -IinR '!\$acc\|!\$omp' --exclude='parallel_macros.fpp' --exclude='syscheck.fpp' ./src/* || true)"; then + if [ -n "$matches" ]; then + echo "Found raw OpenACC/OpenMP directives in the following locations:" + echo "$matches" + exit 1 + fi + fi Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion improves the robustness and debuggability of the CI script by handling grep errors and providing clearer output on failure, which is a valuable enhancement.	Low
More

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 40.93%. Comparing base (f8830e5) to head (7007ee7).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #986   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.93%   40.93%           
=======================================
  Files          70       70           
  Lines       20288    20288           
  Branches     2517     2517           
=======================================
  Hits         8305     8305           
  Misses      10447    10447           
  Partials     1536     1536           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.