Conversation
|
|
||
| resource "null_resource" "output-vpc-endpoint-id" { | ||
| provisioner "local-exec" { | ||
| command = "aws transfer describe-server --server-id ${var.transfer_server_id} --query 'Server.EndpointDetails.VpcEndpointId' > ${data.template_file.log_name.rendered}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cloud posse: https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-transfer-sftp
aws terraform provider: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws/latest/docs/resources/transfer_server
| depends_on = [ | ||
| data.aws_vpc_endpoint.this | ||
| ] | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am reusing the first terraform called only record !
|
thread: https://3pillarglobal.slack.com/archives/C02N9MVF0/p1677871126411499 "It's also good to highlight the positive aspect of this. The PR includes a generic Route53 record module that adds to the functionality of managed Kube. The only issue is with the record-sftp-transfer-server-vpc-endpoint |

Where I am using this branch
https://github.com/exact-payments/gruntwork-infrastructure-live/pull/1523/files#diff-e4e4cb018f9616b9193a6577d685fa8da8acf6abfa2037d213c0ed1b6177b767R12
Test cases
Test cases about indivual module: record-vpc-enpoint-sftp-transfer
Sftp connection test
How looks like record route 53

Appy