-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
Add detailed build instructions to Readme #235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mrbean-bremen
merged 2 commits into
MeVisLab:master
from
tonka3000:add-build-instructions
Sep 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it first checks for the path "generated_cpp", assuming that your self-generated sources are there, and only if it does not exist it checks for the other paths (see
common.prf).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed. No need to remove any pre-generated bindings. The generated_cpp will be used if created by user. I once tried to generate bindings and failed, so I've used 5.6 pre-gen bindings for a long time instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think it is a valid point - it is always preferrable to use the bindings generated for your concrete version instead of a pre-generated one for an older version. That generating the bindings did not work reliably before was one reason to use the pre-generated bindings that is now obsolete.
So maybe lessen the tone of the recommendation a bit ("It is recommended to build the Qt bindings yourself and not use the pregenerated ones."), and add a bit of a rational.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've lessen the tone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is partly true, in the sense that while it does build the generator first, it does not generate the bindings, so if you haven't built them before it will indeed use the checked-in ones.
I think you can leave it as is, but ultimately PythonQt.pro shall be adapted to also generate the bindings, maybe depending on some variable (or add the CMakeLists.txt files, or both).