release: sync stable to main for version 7.70.0#27426
Closed
metamaskbot wants to merge 16 commits intomainfrom
Closed
release: sync stable to main for version 7.70.0#27426metamaskbot wants to merge 16 commits intomainfrom
metamaskbot wants to merge 16 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
- chore: Bump Snaps dependencies (#27335) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** This bumps Snaps dependencies to the latest versions. ## **Changelog** <!-- If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the CHANGELOG, you can choose to either: 1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null` 2. Label with `no-changelog` If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing description in the past tense like: `CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs` `CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker` (This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and accurately) --> CHANGELOG entry: Add support for additional icon colors in Snaps `Icon` component. ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** ```gherkin Feature: my feature name Scenario: user [verb for user action] Given [describe expected initial app state] When user [verb for user action] Then [describe expected outcome] ``` ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I've included tests if applicable - [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. <!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --- > [!NOTE] > **Medium Risk** > Updates multiple `@metamask/snaps-*` packages and wires new/changed SnapInterface controller actions, which could subtly affect Snap UI rendering and interface lifecycle behavior. Main functional change is limited, but dependency upgrades and messenger action-surface changes increase regression risk. > > **Overview** > **Bumps Snaps dependencies** (notably `@metamask/snaps-sdk` to `^11.0.0` and related `snaps-controllers`, `snaps-rpc-methods`, `snaps-utils`, execution environments), updating `yarn.lock` accordingly. > > Extends the Snap UI `Icon` renderer to support additional color variants (`error`, `warning`, `success`). Aligns Snap interface plumbing with updated controller APIs by switching `getInterfaceState` to call `SnapInterfaceController:getInterfaceState`, adding `SnapInterfaceController:setInterfaceDisplayed` to allowed messenger actions/permission specs, and updating Snap UI test utilities to include `displayed: true`. Also bumps the test-snaps fixture URL to `3.4.1`. > > <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 0702f6e. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup> <!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY --> [2513c6f](2513c6f) Co-authored-by: Maarten Zuidhoorn <maarten@zuidhoorn.com>
The encryptorAdapter introduced in PR #26258 overrides encryptWithKey to return browser-passworder format ({ data }) instead of the mobile Encryptor format ({ cipher }). However, decrypt and decryptWithDetail were not overridden — they were spread from the mobile Encryptor, which reads the cipher field. This caused a crash on the next unlock after any background JWT token refresh: TypeError: The first argument must be one of type string, Buffer... Received type undefined (quick-crypto.ts:101) Fix: add normalizeVaultFormat which injects cipher = data when a vault has data but no cipher, and override decrypt and decryptWithDetail in the adapter to normalize before delegating to the underlying Encryptor. Also harden decryptWithKey to accept both data and cipher fields (for pre-adapter vaults that only carry cipher), and throw explicitly when both fields are absent. Adds end-to-end tests that reproduce the bug scenario: background token refresh writes a data-format vault via encryptWithKey, then decrypt / decryptWithDetail must recover it on the next unlock.
Made-with: Cursor
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->
## **Description**
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
## **Changelog**
<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`
If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`
(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->
CHANGELOG entry: null
## **Related issues**
Fixes:
## **Manual testing steps**
```gherkin
Feature: my feature name
Scenario: user [verb for user action]
Given [describe expected initial app state]
When user [verb for user action]
Then [describe expected outcome]
```
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->
### **Before**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
### **After**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Documentation-only change updating release notes and compare links; no
runtime code paths are affected.
>
> **Overview**
> Adds a new `7.68.1` section to `CHANGELOG.md` (noting additional Snaps
`Icon` color support) and updates the bottom compare links so
`[Unreleased]` now compares from `v7.68.1` plus a new `[7.68.1]`
reference.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
148b286. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
# 🚀 v7.68.1 Testing & Release Quality Process Hi Team, As part of our new **MetaMask Release Quality Process**, here’s a quick overview of the key processes, testing strategies, and milestones to ensure a smooth and high-quality deployment. --- ## 📋 Key Processes ### Testing Strategy - **Developer Teams:** Conduct regression and exploratory testing for your functional areas, including automated and manual tests for critical workflows. - **QA Team:** Focus on exploratory testing across the wallet, prioritize high-impact areas, and triage any Sentry errors found during testing. - **Customer Success Team:** Validate new functionalities and provide feedback to support release monitoring. ### GitHub Signoff - Each team must **sign off on the Release Candidate (RC)** via GitHub by the end of the validation timeline (**Tuesday EOD PT**). - Ensure all tests outlined in the Testing Plan are executed, and any identified issues are addressed. ### Issue Resolution - **Resolve all Release Blockers** (Sev0 and Sev1) by **Tuesday EOD PT**. - For unresolved blockers, PRs may be reverted, or feature flags disabled to maintain release quality and timelines. ### Cherry-Picking Criteria - Only **critical fixes** meeting outlined criteria will be cherry-picked. - Developers must ensure these fixes are thoroughly reviewed, tested, and merged by **Tuesday EOD PT**. --- ## 🗓️ Timeline and Milestones 1. **Today (Friday):** Begin Release Candidate validation. 2. **Tuesday EOD PT:** Finalize RC with all fixes and cherry-picks. 3. **Wednesday:** Buffer day for final checks. 4. **Thursday:** Submit release to app stores and begin rollout to 1% of users. 5. **Monday:** Scale deployment to 10%. 6. **Tuesday:** Full rollout to 100%. --- ## ✅ Signoff Checklist Each team is responsible for signing off via GitHub. Use the checkbox below to track signoff completion: # Team sign-off checklist - [ ] Mobile Platform This process is a major step forward in ensuring release stability and quality. Let’s stay aligned and make this release a success! 🚀 Feel free to reach out if you have questions or need clarification. Many thanks in advance # Reference - Testing plan sheet - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tsoodlAlyvEUpkkcNcbZ4PM9HuC9cEM80RZeoVv5OCQ/edit?gid=404070372#gid=404070372
Contributor
|
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
Contributor
🔍 Smart E2E Test Selection
click to see 🤖 AI reasoning detailsE2E Test Selection: Performance Test Selection: |
Made-with: Cursor
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->
## **Description**
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
## **Changelog**
<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`
If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`
(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->
CHANGELOG entry: null
## **Related issues**
Fixes:
## **Manual testing steps**
```gherkin
Feature: my feature name
Scenario: user [verb for user action]
Given [describe expected initial app state]
When user [verb for user action]
Then [describe expected outcome]
```
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->
### **Before**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
### **After**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Low risk documentation-only change that updates the changelog and
version compare links; no runtime behavior is modified.
>
> **Overview**
> Adds a new `7.68.2` section to `CHANGELOG.md` documenting a fix for
seedless onboarding users being locked out after a background token
refresh.
>
> Updates the changelog reference links so `Unreleased` now compares
from `v7.68.2` and includes a new `7.68.2` compare link.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
41e109b. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
|
# 🚀 v7.68.2 Testing & Release Quality Process Hi Team, As part of our new **MetaMask Release Quality Process**, here’s a quick overview of the key processes, testing strategies, and milestones to ensure a smooth and high-quality deployment. --- ## 📋 Key Processes ### Testing Strategy - **Developer Teams:** Conduct regression and exploratory testing for your functional areas, including automated and manual tests for critical workflows. - **QA Team:** Focus on exploratory testing across the wallet, prioritize high-impact areas, and triage any Sentry errors found during testing. - **Customer Success Team:** Validate new functionalities and provide feedback to support release monitoring. ### GitHub Signoff - Each team must **sign off on the Release Candidate (RC)** via GitHub by the end of the validation timeline (**Tuesday EOD PT**). - Ensure all tests outlined in the Testing Plan are executed, and any identified issues are addressed. ### Issue Resolution - **Resolve all Release Blockers** (Sev0 and Sev1) by **Tuesday EOD PT**. - For unresolved blockers, PRs may be reverted, or feature flags disabled to maintain release quality and timelines. ### Cherry-Picking Criteria - Only **critical fixes** meeting outlined criteria will be cherry-picked. - Developers must ensure these fixes are thoroughly reviewed, tested, and merged by **Tuesday EOD PT**. --- ## 🗓️ Timeline and Milestones 1. **Today (Friday):** Begin Release Candidate validation. 2. **Tuesday EOD PT:** Finalize RC with all fixes and cherry-picks. 3. **Wednesday:** Buffer day for final checks. 4. **Thursday:** Submit release to app stores and begin rollout to 1% of users. 5. **Monday:** Scale deployment to 10%. 6. **Tuesday:** Full rollout to 100%. --- ## ✅ Signoff Checklist Each team is responsible for signing off via GitHub. Use the checkbox below to track signoff completion: # Team sign-off checklist - [ ] Mobile Platform This process is a major step forward in ensuring release stability and quality. Let’s stay aligned and make this release a success! 🚀 Feel free to reach out if you have questions or need clarification. Many thanks in advance # Reference - Testing plan sheet - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tsoodlAlyvEUpkkcNcbZ4PM9HuC9cEM80RZeoVv5OCQ/edit?gid=404070372#gid=404070372
chloeYue
previously approved these changes
Mar 12, 2026
github-actions
bot
force-pushed
the
stable-main-7.70.0
branch
from
089d1ba to
e4fe853
Compare
chloeYue
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2026
Contributor
|
Close in favour of #27467 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR syncs the stable branch to main for version 7.70.0.
Synchronization Process:
File Preservation:
Preserves specific files from the stable branch:
Indicates the next version candidate of main to 7.70.0