Update keyless-connections.md

[srishtigangulyabb]

The correct audience for Azure Cognitive Search with RBAC is https://search.azure.com.

Old SDKs or legacy code might use .windows.net, but for Azure AD/RBAC, it’s .azure.com.

[prmerger-automator]

@srishtigangulyabb : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit ac7675f:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
articles/search/keyless-connections.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

[v-dirichards]

@HeidiSteen

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[v-dirichards]

@HeidiSteen Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter #sign-off in a comment if it's ready to merge?

Thanks!

[HeidiSteen]

Need more information on why you are proposing this edit.

[HeidiSteen]

Hi @srishtigangulyabb, I don't understand this edit. This value is the scope ("In the context of Microsoft Entra, scopes refer to the permissions or access levels granted to external identities"), and it's a string, not a URL.

[v-dirichards]

@srishtigangulyabb Could you respond to the comment above?

[srishtigangulyabb]

The proposed change is from "https://search.windows.net" to "https://search.azure.com".

I have tried the code sample mentioned in the documentation but it gave me an error. When I learnt that the audience value should be "https://search.azure.com", I raised a request to update the documentation with the corrected value.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions.
Get Help
Docs Support Teams Channel
Resolve Merge Conflict

[ttorble]

@srishtigangulyabb

Can you respond to the author's question?

[HeidiSteen]

Thank you for the contribution. I took a closer look, and you are correct about the valid value. We'll merge your update, and then I'll go back and add a few more examples.

[HeidiSteen]

#sign-off