Skip to content

Commit a19da10

Browse files
Merge pull request #298969 from raghavendermareddy/patch-549773
Clarify ECMP statement
2 parents 1478ece + 14e683c commit a19da10

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

articles/expressroute/designing-for-disaster-recovery-with-expressroute-privatepeering.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ services: expressroute
55
author: duongau
66
ms.service: azure-expressroute
77
ms.topic: concept-article
8-
ms.date: 11/18/2024
8+
ms.date: 04/28/2025
99
ms.author: duau
1010
---
1111

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Let's consider the example network illustrated in the following diagram. In the
6868

6969
:::image type="content" source="./media/designing-for-disaster-recovery-with-expressroute-pvt/one-region.png" alt-text="Diagram of small to medium size on-premises network considerations.":::
7070

71-
By default, if you advertise routes identically over all the ExpressRoute paths, Azure load-balances on-premises bound traffic across all the ExpressRoute paths using Equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing.
71+
By default, if you advertise routes identically over all the ExpressRoute paths, Azure load-balances on-premises bound traffic across a maximum of 4 ExpressRoute circuits using Equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing.
7272

7373
However, with the geo-redundant ExpressRoute circuits we need to take into consideration different network performances with different network paths (particularly for network latency). To get more consistent network performance during normal operation, you may want to prefer the ExpressRoute circuit that offers the minimal latency.
7474

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)