Merge pull request #2619 from YongRhee-MSFT/docs-editor/evaluate-exploit-protection-1738364101

Update evaluate-exploit-protection.md

Author: denisebmsft

defender-endpoint/evaluate-exploit-protection.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ms.collection:
 - tier2
 - mde-asr
 search.appverid: met150
-ms.date: 11/21/2024
+ms.date: 02/03/2025
 ---
 
 # Evaluate exploit protection
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ For Adobe Reader use the following ASR rule:
 
 •	[Block Adobe Reader from creating child processes](attack-surface-reduction-rules-reference.md#block-adobe-reader-from-creating-child-processes)
 
+[Google Chrome ](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/docs/security/faq.md#Can-I-use-EMET-to-help-protect-Chrome-against-attack-on-Microsoft-Windows)no longer recommends enabling Exploit Protection (EMET) because it's redundant or superseded with built-in attack mitigations.
+
 ## Application compatibility list
 
 The following table lists specific products that have compatibility issues with the mitigations that are included in exploit protection. You must disable specific incompatible mitigations if you want to protect the product by using exploit protection. Be aware that this list takes into consideration the default settings for the latest versions of the product.  Compatibility issues can introduced when you apply certain add-ins or other components to the standard software.
@@ -102,7 +104,7 @@ The following table lists specific products that have compatibility issues with
 | Certain AMD (ATI) video drivers   | System ASLR=AlwaysOn   |
 | DropBox   | EAF  |
 | Excel Power Query, Power View, Power Map and PowerPivot   | EAF  |
-| Google Chrome   | EAF+   |
+| Google Chrome   ([no longer recommended](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/docs/security/faq.md#Can-I-use-EMET-to-help-protect-Chrome-against-attack-on-Microsoft-Windows))| EAF+   |
 | Immidio Flex+   | EAF   |
 | Microsoft Office Web Components (OWC)   | System DEP=AlwaysOn  |
 | Microsoft PowerPoint   | EAF   |