feat: merge main

[shijinpjlab]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @shijinpjlab, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on maintenance and minor enhancements, including updating project metadata to reflect branding changes and a new repository location. It also introduces user experience improvements to the Gradio application by providing better default values and a more suitable component for displaying structured output. Furthermore, a dependency constraint has been relaxed to allow for broader compatibility with the openai library, accompanied by a minor version bump for the project.

Highlights

• Project Branding and Repository Update: The citation information across all README files (English, Japanese, and Simplified Chinese) has been updated. The project title now explicitly includes 'AI' (e.g., 'A Comprehensive AI Data Quality Evaluation Tool'), and the GitHub repository URL has been changed from DataEval/dingo to MigoXLab/dingo.
• Gradio UI Enhancements: The Gradio application's user interface has been improved by setting a default value of 'content' for the column_content textbox. Additionally, the summary_output component has been upgraded from a gr.Textbox to a gr.JSON component, enhancing the display and readability of structured summary data.
• Dependency Version Flexibility: The openai dependency in requirements/runtime.txt has been updated to allow for greater version flexibility, changing from a strict ==1.56.2 to >=1.56.2. This enables the project to utilize newer compatible versions of the openai library.
• Version Increment: The project version specified in setup.py has been incremented from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1, indicating a minor release or patch.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request appears to be a patch release, incorporating updates to documentation, UI enhancements for the Gradio application, and a modification to a dependency. The changes are generally positive. However, I have an important suggestion regarding the versioning of the openai dependency in requirements/runtime.txt to enhance long-term stability and prevent potential future breakages. Additionally, for better clarity, it would be beneficial if future pull request titles were more descriptive of the changes they contain.

[gemini-code-assist]

While allowing newer versions of openai provides flexibility, using >= without an upper bound is risky. It could pull in a future major version (e.g., 2.0.0) with breaking API changes, which would likely cause this library to fail. It's a best practice to specify a compatible range to prevent this.

I suggest using a pessimistic version constraint to allow updates within the current major version but prevent breaking changes from a future major version.

openai>=1.56.2, <2.0.0