Skip to content

Conversation

@e06084
Copy link
Collaborator

@e06084 e06084 commented Dec 16, 2025

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @e06084, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to data security by adding a new feature for detecting Personal Identifiable Information (PII) within text. The primary objective is to proactively identify and manage sensitive data like ID numbers, phone numbers, emails, and credit card details. This addition not only strengthens the system's ability to protect sensitive information but also provides mechanisms for validating and masking such data, aligning with modern data protection standards and improving overall data governance.

Highlights

  • New PII Detection Rule: A new RulePIIDetection class has been introduced to identify various types of Personal Identifiable Information (PII) within text content, registered under the QUALITY_BAD_SECURITY metric.
  • Comprehensive PII Patterns and Validation: The rule supports detection of a wide range of PII, including Chinese ID cards, credit cards, Chinese mobile phones, email addresses, US Social Security Numbers (SSN), Chinese passports, and IP addresses. It incorporates advanced validation logic such as the Luhn algorithm for credit cards and specific IP address validation.
  • Sensitive Data Masking: Custom masking strategies have been implemented for different PII types (e.g., email, phone, ID card, credit card, IP address) to redact sensitive information while retaining partial visibility for context.
  • Updated Documentation and Extensive Testing: The metrics.md documentation has been updated to reflect the new PII detection capability, and comprehensive unit tests have been added to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the PII detection, validation, and masking functionalities.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new rule for detecting Personally Identifiable Information (PII), which is a great addition for improving data security. The implementation is well-structured with regex patterns, validators, and masking logic. The test coverage is also quite comprehensive.

My review includes a few suggestions to improve the correctness and maintainability of the new rule:

  • A high-severity fix for the credit card detection regex to support all valid card lengths.
  • A correction for the email detection regex.
  • Suggestions for refactoring the PII masking and result grouping logic for better efficiency and maintainability.
  • A recommendation to expand test coverage for credit card numbers to include more lengths.

Overall, this is a solid contribution. Addressing these points will make the PII detection feature more robust and reliable.

Comment on lines 2512 to 2514
high_severity = [item for item in detected_pii if item["severity"] == "high"]
medium_severity = [item for item in detected_pii if item["severity"] == "medium"]
low_severity = [item for item in detected_pii if item["severity"] == "low"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

These three list comprehensions iterate over detected_pii three separate times. For better performance, you could iterate once and group the items by severity. Using collections.defaultdict would be an efficient way to achieve this.

Example:

from collections import defaultdict

pii_by_severity = defaultdict(list)
for item in detected_pii:
    pii_by_severity[item["severity"]].append(item)

high_severity = pii_by_severity.get("high", [])
# ... and so on for other severities

This approach is more efficient and scales better if more severity levels are added in the future.

@e06084 e06084 merged commit 99ab8ab into MigoXLab:dev Dec 17, 2025
2 checks passed
tenwanft pushed a commit to tenwanft/dingo that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
* feat: add PII detetction
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant