-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
feat: duplicate key notice dynamic fieldName and fieldValue #1994
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit 46ce307 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Errors (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. New Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check0 out of 1824 sources (~0 %) are corrupted. ⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
skalexch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good on the spec side. Thanks for working on this!
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit c99e359 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (1 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅Details of new errors due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. New Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check0 out of 1824 sources (~0 %) are corrupted. ⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
davidgamez
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit 164a860 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Errors (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. New Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 1824 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check0 out of 1824 sources (~0 %) are corrupted. ⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
Summary:
Closes #1975
duplicate_keynotice to include only defined field names and values for composite keys.oldCsvRowNumberandnewCsvRowNummberExpected behavior:

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!
gradle testto make sure you didn't break anything