Skip to content

Conversation

@mag1c-h
Copy link
Contributor

@mag1c-h mag1c-h commented Dec 28, 2025

Background

Currently, all dependency preparation logic is implemented in a unified public function. While this centralized approach simplifies the code structure, it introduces several limitations:

  • Unable to set dependency-specific configuration items for each dependency
  • Configuration interference between dependencies, making isolation difficult
  • Violation of the Open/Closed Principle when adding new dependencies (requires modification of the common function)
  • Inflexible dependency configuration for complex business scenarios

Solution

Split the dependency preparation logic into corresponding dependency files to achieve the following improvements:

Key Changes

  • Remove the unified dependency preparation function
  • Add independent preparation logic functions in each dependency file
  • Provide separate configuration space for each dependency
  • Maintain backward compatibility to ensure existing functionality remains unaffected

Implementation Details

  1. Dependency Isolation: Each dependency has its own preparation function with non-interfering configuration items
  2. Configuration Flexibility: Dependency-specific configurations can be set based on individual requirements
  3. Easy Extension: New dependencies can be added without modifying other files
  4. Maintenance Convenience: Dependency-related logic is centralized in respective files for easier maintenance

Impact Analysis

  • Improved code maintainability and extensibility
  • Enhanced dependency configuration flexibility
  • Reduced coupling between dependencies

@mag1c-h mag1c-h merged commit 77ba17d into ModelEngine-Group:develop Dec 29, 2025
3 checks passed
@mag1c-h mag1c-h deleted the dev-opt-vendor branch December 29, 2025 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants