-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
(fix) fix rms_norm op #946
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @SangChengC, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request implements a fix for the rms_norm operation within the Triton kernel. The core change involves refining a specific heuristic parameter (num_warps) to ensure the stability and correct execution of this crucial normalization layer, which is vital for the performance and reliability of large language models.
Highlights
- RMSNorm Kernel Adjustment: The
num_warpsheuristic in thermsnorm_forwardTriton kernel has been adjusted. The maximum allowed warps were reduced from 8 to 4. This change likely addresses a stability or performance issue within therms_normoperation, particularly for thelightllmLlama model implementation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes an issue in the rmsnorm Triton kernel by reducing the maximum number of warps from 8 to 4. My feedback focuses on improving the code's clarity by documenting the reason for this change, which will help with future maintenance.
| raise RuntimeError("This layer norm doesn't support feature dim >= 64KB.") | ||
| # heuristics for number of warps | ||
| num_warps = min(max(BLOCK_SIZE // 256, 1), 8) | ||
| num_warps = min(max(BLOCK_SIZE // 256, 1), 4) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR title suggests this change is a fix. It would be very helpful for future maintenance to add a brief inline comment explaining why the maximum number of warps is capped at 4. This provides context for why this specific value was chosen, for example, if it addresses a performance or stability issue on certain hardware.
| num_warps = min(max(BLOCK_SIZE // 256, 1), 4) | |
| num_warps = min(max(BLOCK_SIZE // 256, 1), 4) # Capped at 4 for performance/stability reasons |
No description provided.