-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
INTPYTHON-617 - Improve DictField to_python performance #2888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
NoahStapp
wants to merge
6
commits into
MongoEngine:master
Choose a base branch
from
NoahStapp:INTPYTHON-617
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2931801
WIP
NoahStapp d4619bd
INTPYTHON-617 - Improve DictField to_python performance
NoahStapp 40aa9a5
Cleanup
NoahStapp e377528
Refresh CI
NoahStapp 2586d45
Refresh CI
NoahStapp 6cf60d2
to_python should return falsy values
NoahStapp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this would convert a
{}toNoneThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Outputs
{}.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some example test cases showing where the behavior differs:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not as elegant, but I think this should handle the failed cases while preserving most of the performance improvement:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this can be simplified:
This passes all of the current test cases plus the ones you've added above.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@NoahStapp if a DictField receives an invalid/non-dict value (e.g. a list instead of a dict), I think the one I proposed (and orig) would give a mongoengine ValidationError, while the one you proposed would give a standard error (AttributeError?)
getattr also has a bit of a performance hit, although I haven't benchmarked it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using my proposed code, I get a ValidationError when passing an invalid value to a
DictField: