fix: DTOSS-11714 Updating rule 60 Superseded Numbers and adding a new rule 61

[stephhou]

Description

Ticket: https://nhsd-jira.digital.nhs.uk/browse/DTOSS-11714

• Edited existing superseded rule 60 to only transform the reason for removal to ORR when the record does not have an existing Reason for Removal.
• Added superseded rule 61 which is a no transform rule but is required to raise an exception for all superseded records that do have an existing RfR so they are included in the superseded UI report.
• Added the superseded category 13 to rule 61 to ensure reporting is possible.

Context

Currently the reason for removal on superseded records is transformed to ORR. This rule was originally introduced to ensure that all superseded records were deducted in BS Select. From observing the rule and the output it was agreed that it was important to understand the context of the original RfR (if there is one) to understand the best cause of action for that record.

Type of changes

• Refactoring (non-breaking change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

• I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
• I have followed the code style of the project
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• I have updated the documentation accordingly
• This PR is a result of pair or mob programming

---

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

• I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

[github-actions]

Your Pull Request title must meet the conventional commit standards, please see the following documentation - https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

✔️ Tests 895 / 895 - passed in 71.6s
📝 Coverage 47.01%
📏 4630 / 10127 lines covered 🌿 1136 / 2138 branches covered
🔍 click here for more details

✏️ updated for commit 56ad4d6

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud