Skip to content

Conversation

@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir
Copy link
Contributor

@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir commented Mar 6, 2025

Description

Context

Type of changes

  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • I have followed the code style of the project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • This PR is a result of pair or mob programming

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

  • I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir force-pushed the move-skipe-code-into-real-repo branch 2 times, most recently from 83d8d32 to 95eb81d Compare March 10, 2025 14:47
@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir force-pushed the move-skipe-code-into-real-repo branch 2 times, most recently from 843b5bd to 4d44ec5 Compare March 12, 2025 10:02
@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 10:10
pyproject.toml Outdated
[tool.ruff.lint]
select = ["ALL"]
ignore = ["COM812", "D"]
ignore = ["COM812", "D", "PGH003"]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's more cumbersome to include the specific type warnings, so I can understand why we might want to allow the blanket ignore, but I'd like to keep an eye on usage :D

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree.

Good spot - this one can be removed now BTW.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's specifically recommended to ignore COM812 if you are using ruff's formatting, which we are.

The "D" rules, on the other hand, we might want to discuss. Do we want to require docstrings on all classes and functions?

Copy link
Collaborator

@eddalmond1 eddalmond1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good - happy this represents what we saw in the spike but with some nice additions to our workflows

@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir merged commit 3165532 into main Mar 12, 2025
23 checks passed
@acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir acerathereinspirative-nhs-nvir deleted the move-skipe-code-into-real-repo branch March 12, 2025 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants