Skip to content

Conversation

@Akol125
Copy link
Contributor

@Akol125 Akol125 commented Sep 30, 2025

Summary

  • Routine Change
  • ❗ Breaking Change
  • 🤖 Operational or Infrastructure Change
  • ✨ New Feature
  • ⚠️ Potential issues that might be caused by this change

Add any other relevant notes or explanations here. Remove this line if you have nothing to add.

Reviews Required

  • Dev
  • Test
  • Tech Author
  • Product Owner

Review Checklist

ℹ️ This section is to be filled in by the reviewer.

  • I have reviewed the changes in this PR and they fill all or part of the acceptance criteria of the ticket, and the code is in a mergeable state.
  • If there were infrastructure, operational, or build changes, I have made sure there is sufficient evidence that the changes will work.
  • I have ensured the changelog has been updated by the submitter, if necessary.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This branch is working on a ticket in the NHS England VED JIRA Project. Here's a handy link to the ticket:

VED-809

@Akol125 Akol125 force-pushed the VED-809-destroy-pipeline branch from 5793abd to efa6397 Compare September 30, 2025 14:14
@NHSDigital NHSDigital deleted a comment from sonarqubecloud bot Sep 30, 2025
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
pr_number:
description: The PR number of the environment to teardown
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe worth include an example at the end e.g. 123. People might forget it needs to just be the number rather than pr-123.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The example should be 123, not pr-123

dlzhry2nhs
dlzhry2nhs previously approved these changes Sep 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dlzhry2nhs dlzhry2nhs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. One minor comment.

Also would be good if we could see a full destroy run and then reapply.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@Akol125 Akol125 closed this Sep 30, 2025
@Akol125 Akol125 deleted the VED-809-destroy-pipeline branch September 30, 2025 17:21
@Akol125 Akol125 restored the VED-809-destroy-pipeline branch September 30, 2025 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants