Skip to content

Conversation

@romanc
Copy link
Collaborator

@romanc romanc commented Jan 6, 2026

Description

On Quantities, we have currently allow both backend and gt4py_backend where the later is deprecated and about to be removed.

See NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#312 and NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#314 for context.

/cc @FlorianDeconinck

How Has This Been Tested?

Search and manual replace of gt4py_backend with just backend. CI is still green.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas: N/A
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation: N/A
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • New check tests, if applicable, are included: N/A
  • Targeted model if this changed was triggered by a model need/shortcoming: N/A

On `Quantities`, we have currently allow both `backend` and
`gt4py_backend` where the later is deprecated and about to be removed.
See NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#312 and
NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#314 for context.
@romanc romanc requested review from fmalatino and oelbert January 6, 2026 13:41
@romanc romanc changed the title refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend on quantities Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants