-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
o3-mini-20250131 -> o3-mini-2025-01-31 #1149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bzantium <ryumin93@gmail.com>
Greptile SummaryThis PR fixes an incorrect OpenAI model identifier used for the LLM-as-a-judge feature in evaluation pipelines. The model name
Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NemoSkills as Nemo-Skills CLI
participant Config as Dataset Config<br/>(hle/__init__.py)
participant OpenAI as OpenAI API
User->>NemoSkills: ns eval --benchmarks=hle
NemoSkills->>Config: Load JUDGE_PIPELINE_ARGS
Config-->>NemoSkills: model: "o3-mini-2025-01-31"
NemoSkills->>OpenAI: POST /v1/chat/completions<br/>model=o3-mini-2025-01-31
OpenAI-->>NemoSkills: Judge response
NemoSkills-->>User: Evaluation results
|
Greptile found no issues!From now on, if a review finishes and we haven't found any issues, we will not post anything, but you can confirm that we reviewed your changes in the status check section. This feature can be toggled off in your Code Review Settings by deselecting "Create a status check for each PR". |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request corrects a model identifier across documentation and configuration files. The judge model name is updated from "o3-mini-20250131" to "o3-mini-2025-01-31" (the correct OpenAI model name) in five files. No functional logic or control flow changes are introduced. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@wedu-nvidia could you please test this and if works approve / merge? |
Ok, sure. |
wedu-nvidia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and verified, it looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: bzantium <ryumin93@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Igor Gitman <igitman@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: dlord <dlord@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: bzantium <ryumin93@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Igor Gitman <igitman@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Ping Hsieh <chsieh@nvidia.com>
Fixes: #1148
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.