Skip to content

Conversation

@SimengLiu-nv
Copy link
Collaborator

@SimengLiu-nv SimengLiu-nv commented Nov 21, 2025

…rch_streaming to cover multi-beam streaming cases required by the NIM team.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive test coverage for beam search functionality with streaming support in batch completion requests.
    • Validates that beam search produces distinct outputs across multiple beams and maintains consistency when identical prompts are processed.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Description

Test Coverage

PR Checklist

Please review the following before submitting your PR:

  • PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.

  • PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.

  • Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)

  • Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities

  • CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes

  • Documentation updated as needed

  • Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.

  • The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.

  • Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

Details

run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id (OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.

--disable-reuse-test (OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--test-backend "pytorch, cpp" (OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".

--detailed-log (OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.

--debug (OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in the stage-list parameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md
and the scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.py helper.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

…rch_streaming to cover multi-beam streaming cases required by the NIM team.

Signed-off-by: SimengLiu-nv <[email protected]>
@SimengLiu-nv SimengLiu-nv requested a review from ixlmar November 21, 2025 00:31
@SimengLiu-nv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot run

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new asynchronous test function is added to validate beam search functionality with streaming for OpenAI completions. The test sends batch requests with multiple prompts and beams, streams results, and asserts consistency and distinctiveness of beam outputs.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
New beam search streaming test
tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py
Adds test_batch_completions_beam_search_streaming() to test beam search with streaming; validates distinct beam outputs and consistent results across identical prompts.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify the test function follows existing streaming test patterns and conventions
  • Confirm beam search assertions correctly validate distinctiveness and consistency behavior
  • Ensure parameterization aligns with related test functions

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (3 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning Title is truncated and incomplete, ending with '…' and lacking the required [type] descriptor and descriptive summary. Complete the title following the template format: [https://nvbugs/5625743][type] Add test for batch completions with beam search streaming
Description check ⚠️ Warning PR description is incomplete with only a partial summary and unfilled template sections for Description, Test Coverage, and PR Checklist items unchecked. Fill in the Description and Test Coverage sections with details about the test's purpose and coverage, and review all PR Checklist items
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1c9936 and 7b0db8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: moraxu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6303
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/examples_test_list.txt:494-494
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM testing, it's common to have both CLI flow tests (test_cli_flow.py) and PyTorch API tests (test_llm_api_pytorch.py) for the same model. These serve different purposes: CLI flow tests validate the traditional command-line workflow, while PyTorch API tests validate the newer LLM API backend. Both are legitimate and should coexist.
Learnt from: fredricz-20070104
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7645
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt:648-648
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test lists, it's common and intentional for the same test to appear in multiple test list files when they serve different purposes (e.g., llm_function_core.txt for comprehensive core functionality testing and llm_function_core_sanity.txt for quick sanity checks). This duplication allows tests to be run in different testing contexts.
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py (1)
tensorrt_llm/_torch/pyexecutor/model_engine.py (1)
  • use_beam_search (517-518)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py

222-222: Comment contains ambiguous × (MULTIPLICATION SIGN). Did you mean x (LATIN SMALL LETTER X)?

(RUF003)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py (1)

207-233: LGTM! Solid test coverage for beam search streaming.

The test correctly validates multi-beam streaming behavior by:

  • Verifying different beams produce distinct outputs (line 229)
  • Confirming identical prompts yield consistent beams across positions (lines 231-232)
  • Using temperature=0.0 for deterministic, reproducible assertions

The logic mirrors the non-streaming test_batch_completions_beam_search test and aligns with the PR objectives for NIM team requirements.

stream=True,
extra_body=dict(use_beam_search=True),
)
texts = [""] * 4 # 2 prompts × 2 beams = 4 choices
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Replace Unicode multiplication sign with ASCII 'x'.

The comment uses × (Unicode MULTIPLICATION SIGN) instead of ASCII x. For consistency and to avoid potential encoding issues, use the ASCII character.

Apply this diff:

-    texts = [""] * 4  # 2 prompts × 2 beams = 4 choices
+    texts = [""] * 4  # 2 prompts x 2 beams = 4 choices

Based on static analysis hints.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
texts = [""] * 4 # 2 prompts × 2 beams = 4 choices
texts = [""] * 4 # 2 prompts x 2 beams = 4 choices
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)

222-222: Comment contains ambiguous × (MULTIPLICATION SIGN). Did you mean x (LATIN SMALL LETTER X)?

(RUF003)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In tests/unittest/llmapi/apps/_test_openai_completions.py around line 222, the
inline comment uses the Unicode multiplication sign '×'; replace it with the
ASCII letter 'x' so the comment reads "2 prompts × 2 beams = 4 choices" → "2
prompts x 2 beams = 4 choices" to ensure consistent ASCII encoding and avoid
potential encoding issues.

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #25257 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 7b0db8d

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #25257 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: 7b0db8d
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #19104 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

choice = chunk.choices[0]
texts[choice.index] += choice.text

# Verify beam search produces different outputs for different beams
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, however https://nvbugs/5625743 does not pass use_beam_search=True (the default is False).

So, ideally we could parametrize the test to also cover use_beam_search=False. For this case, in order not to hit this check, you could specify a very small (but non-zero) temperature. The check in L229 would need to be skipped then, since decoding is greedy-like for temperature -> 0 (unless logits are tied).

@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="module")
@pytest.mark.parametrize("prompts",
[["Hello, my name is"] * 2, [[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]] * 2])
async def test_batch_completions_beam_search_streaming(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this test executed in pre-merge or post-merge? i'm trying to follow the logic through the nested ways to invoke tests - will this test end up calling it? https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/blob/main/tests/integration/defs/test_e2e.py#L1624

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's on the pre-merge pipeline.

  1. e2e test function:
    def test_openai_completions_example(llm_root, llm_venv, backend: str):
  2. Test list:
    - test_e2e.py::test_openai_completions_example[pytorch]

@SimengLiu-nv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Close this pr as the NIM release will be based of release/1.1. Moving to #9471.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants