-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
Update README with new examples and models #1254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Added new use cases and models for CFD, Weather, Structural Mechanics, Healthcare, and Generative sections in the README.
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryThis PR updates the examples README by adding new models and use cases across multiple domains. New additions include DoMINO NIM fine-tuning and Transolver for CFD, crash dynamics for structural mechanics, reservoir simulation using X-MeshGraphNet, and an active learning section. Critical Issues:
Other Changes:
Important Files ChangedFile Analysis
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Additional Comments (1)
-
examples/README.md, line 69 (link)logic: the directory
./weather/temporal_interpolation/does not exist in the repository
1 file reviewed, 3 comments
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
PhysicsNeMo Pull Request
Description
Added new use cases and models for CFD, Weather, Structural Mechanics, Healthcare, and Generative sections in the README.
Checklist
Dependencies
Review Process
All PRs are reviewed by the PhysicsNeMo team before merging.
Depending on which files are changed, GitHub may automatically assign a maintainer for review.
We are also testing AI-based code review tools (e.g., Greptile), which may add automated comments with a confidence score.
This score reflects the AI’s assessment of merge readiness and is not a qualitative judgment of your work, nor is
it an indication that the PR will be accepted / rejected.
AI-generated feedback should be reviewed critically for usefulness.
You are not required to respond to every AI comment, but they are intended to help both authors and reviewers.
Please react to Greptile comments with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback on their accuracy.