Skip to content

Enhancement tmcr vehicle equipment profile member#409

Closed
nick-knowles wants to merge 15 commits intoNeTEx-CEN:masterfrom
nick-knowles:enhancement_TMCR-VehicleEqeuipmentPorifleMember
Closed

Enhancement tmcr vehicle equipment profile member#409
nick-knowles wants to merge 15 commits intoNeTEx-CEN:masterfrom
nick-knowles:enhancement_TMCR-VehicleEqeuipmentPorifleMember

Conversation

@nick-knowles
Copy link
Contributor

Also includes example and constraints for previous change to vehicle types to add accepted driver permit.

seime and others added 15 commits April 29, 2022 09:04
* Removed comment about which editor made the change

* Removed comment about which editor was used
* Added Spotless tool to verify and correct xsd/xml file formatting

* Attempt at making Travis validate

* Add more JVM memory, appears to speed up the formatting process

* Only require reformatting of files that have changed since 'master' branch

* Improved documentation

* More docs on formatting

* Fix command line option

* Replaced shall with must for character encoding

* Initial reformatting using Spotless - rules from Eclipse WTP project located in eclipsecodestyle/xml.prefs

* More reformatting after rebasing

* Updated copyright header year (just to trigger build)

* Set travis timeout to 6 hours. Must be reverted after first build

* Make jar plugin include all xsd files

* Bump spotless to latest version

* Run maven with debug trace

* Attempt at getting travis to run

* Disabled formatting checks in travis temporarily
ConditionSummaryChargingGroup not referenced from ConditionSummaryStructure
…ingCalculationGroup

Fix annotation errors and align with definitions in NeTEx pt 3
Add ACCEPTED DRIVER PERMITS to VEHICEL TYpe
Implement VEHICKLE Equipment Profile member, . ALso add example and constraints for ACCEPTED DRIVING PERMIT CR
Copy link
Contributor

@skinkie skinkie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again no.

@ue71603
Copy link
Contributor

ue71603 commented Nov 21, 2023

@Aurige @skinkie do we need here a new clean one too?

@ue71603
Copy link
Contributor

ue71603 commented Dec 16, 2023

integrated into: #612

@ue71603 ue71603 closed this Dec 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants