Merged
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Walkthrough문서 업데이트로 README.md에 기능 설명과 실제 동작 영상 섹션이 다수 추가되었고, SAMPLE_README1.md 템플릿 문서는 삭제되었습니다. 코드나 공개 API 변경은 없습니다. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 19b79eb in 2 minutes and 39 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
241lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. README.md:2
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a Table of Contents at the beginning to help readers navigate this very long document. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. README.md:576
- Draft comment:
For the embedded - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a reasonable suggestion to improve user experience by adding playback controls to embedded videos. The change is simple, clear and would improve functionality. However, I should consider if this is important enough to keep as a PR comment. The comment is about UI functionality rather than core logic. According to the rules, we should not comment on pure UI changes. While it's a UI change, this is about basic video functionality in documentation that impacts usability of the documentation itself, not just aesthetics. Although this is a UI-related comment, it's about fundamental video functionality in documentation that affects usability. The suggestion is clear and actionable.
3. README.md:3
- Draft comment:
Using fixed width/height on images can affect responsiveness. Consider using relative sizing or CSS for better display on various devices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. README.md:903
- Draft comment:
The README is very comprehensive and lengthy. Consider splitting it into separate documents or adding a summarized overview at the top with links to sections. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. README.md:1096
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a License section to clarify the terms under which this project is released. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
6. README.md:50
- Draft comment:
The document uses many HTML
tags for line breaks. Consider using markdown's native formatting for lists and paragraphs to improve readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
7. README.md:1029
- Draft comment:
Review the phrasing in the business model section for clarity; some sentences (e.g., regarding '설정된 기기 판매 조직과 리퍼럴 수수료') might benefit from rewording for clearer communication. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
8. README.md:580
- Draft comment:
Typographical suggestion: In the table row, the third cell currently reads '3.2.9 건강 기록 메인 페이지(자녀)'. For consistency with other cells (e.g., '3.2.9. 건강 기록 메인 페이지(부모)'), consider adding a period after '3.2.9' so it reads '3.2.9. 건강 기록 메인 페이지(자녀)'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment points out a real inconsistency in punctuation, this is an extremely minor formatting issue in a documentation table. The meaning is perfectly clear without the period. The comment doesn't highlight any real problems that need fixing. Documentation formatting nitpicks like this create noise without adding value. The inconsistency does exist and fixing it would make the formatting more uniform. Some might argue that consistency in documentation is important for professionalism. While consistency is good, this is such a minor formatting detail that it's not worth the overhead of a PR comment. The current formatting doesn't impact readability or understanding. Delete this comment as it focuses on an extremely minor formatting issue that doesn't meaningfully impact the documentation.
Workflow ID: wflow_OjHiP0RB1bJ92q7J
You can customize 
Neibce
added a commit
to 2025-PNU-SW-Hackathon/PNUSW-2025-OnGi-10
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2025
* Delete SAMPLE_README1.md * 리드미 초안 작성 중... * docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중... * docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Updates
README.mdwith password masking details, medication reminder features, and video demonstrations; deletesSAMPLE_README1.md.SAMPLE_README1.md, likely redundant after main README update.This description was created by
for 19b79eb. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit