test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #113

Neiland85 · 2025-12-13T14:14:32Z

test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%)
test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%)
test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%)
Cobertura total: 72% -> 96%
34 tests passing

🚀 Pull Request: Complete Railway Deployment Optimization

📋 Descripción del Cambio

Este PR implementa la solución completa para el problema de crashes de Railway después de 2 minutos, junto con la funcionalidad completa del dashboard administrativo para el sistema bancario NeuroBank FastAPI.

🎯 Problema Solucionado

❌ Problema: Aplicación crashes en Railway después de exactamente 2 minutos
❌ Problema: Botones y funcionalidades del admin dashboard no operativas
❌ Problema: Templates genéricos en lugar de específicos
❌ Problema: Configuración de despliegue incompleta

✅ Solución Implementada

✅ Railway Optimization Stack: Configuración completa anti-crash
✅ Admin Dashboard Completo: 100% funcional con interactividad JavaScript
✅ CI/CD Pipeline: GitHub Actions profesional de 8 etapas
✅ Performance: Optimización uvloop + single worker

🔧 Cambios Técnicos Implementados

🚂 Railway Deployment

[railway.json] Configuración con health checks y restart policies
[start.sh] Script de inicio inteligente con validaciones
[Dockerfile] Optimización single worker + uvloop
Resultado: Elimina crashes de 2 minutos

📊 Admin Dashboard

[admin_transactions.html] Panel transacciones completo con Chart.js
[admin_users.html] Gestión usuarios con búsqueda en tiempo real
[admin_reports.html] Reportes avanzados con exportación CSV/Excel
[router.py] Conexiones específicas (no más templates genéricos)
Resultado: 100% funcionalidad operativa

🔄 CI/CD Pipeline

[.github/workflows/production-pipeline.yml] Pipeline de 8 etapas
Etapas: Quality → Testing → Security → Frontend → Validation → Deploy → Monitor → Cleanup
Resultado: Despliegue automático profesional

📚 Documentation Suite

[HOTFIX_RAILWAY_CRASH.md] Análisis técnico del problema Railway
[WORKFLOW.md] Procedimientos de desarrollo
[GIT_COMMANDS_HOTFIX.md] Comandos de despliegue
Resultado: Documentación completa profesional

🧪 Testing & Validation

✅ Funcionalidad Validada

Admin Transactions: Búsqueda, filtros, paginación, exportación
Admin Users: CRUD completo, búsqueda en tiempo real
Admin Reports: Generación reportes, visualizaciones Chart.js
API Endpoints: Respuesta correcta de todos los endpoints
Railway Health: Endpoint /health operativo

🔒 Security Checks

Bandit security scan: Sin vulnerabilidades críticas
Trivy container scan: Imagen Docker segura
Environment variables: Protección de credenciales
Dependencies scan: Paquetes actualizados y seguros

⚡ Performance Tests

uvloop integration: Mejora performance async
Single worker config: Optimización memoria Railway
Static assets: Minificación CSS/JS
Database queries: Optimización consultas

🎯 Business Impact

Métrica	Antes	Después	Mejora
Railway Uptime	Crash 2min	100% estable	+∞%
Admin Functionality	0% operativo	100% funcional	+100%
Deployment Time	Manual	Automático	-80% tiempo
Code Quality	Sin validación	CI/CD completo	+100% confiabilidad

🚀 Deployment Instructions

Pre-merge Checklist

Todas las pruebas CI/CD pasan ✅
Review de código completado
Variables de entorno configuradas en Railway
RAILWAY_TOKEN configurado en GitHub Secrets

Post-merge Actions

Auto-deploy se activará automáticamente en main
Health check validará despliegue exitoso
Monitoring confirmará estabilidad post-deploy

👥 Review Requirements

🔍 Areas de Focus para Review

Railway Config: Validar railway.json y start.sh
Admin Templates: Verificar funcionalidad JavaScript
CI/CD Pipeline: Revisar configuración GitHub Actions
Security: Confirmar protección de variables de entorno

🎯 Expected Reviewers

@Neiland85 (Project Owner)
Backend/DevOps Team Member
Security Team Member (opcional)

📝 Additional Notes

🔄 Future Improvements

Monitoreo avanzado con métricas Railway
Tests automatizados para admin dashboard
Optimización adicional de performance

📚 Related Documentation

HOTFIX_RAILWAY_CRASH.md - Análisis técnico completo
WORKFLOW.md - Procedimientos de desarrollo
SOLUTION_STATUS_FINAL.md - Estado final del proyecto

✅ Ready to Merge Criteria

All CI/CD checks pass ✅
Code review approved by 1+ reviewers
Manual testing completed for admin dashboard
Railway deployment configuration validated
Documentation updated and complete

🎉 Este PR convierte NeuroBank FastAPI en una aplicación bancaria de nivel empresarial con despliegue automático y funcionalidad completa!

- test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%) - test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%) - test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%) - Cobertura total: 72% -> 96% - 34 tests passing

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR adds comprehensive test coverage for three core utility modules (security, telemetry, and logging), increasing overall test coverage from 72% to 96%. The tests are well-organized using class-based groupings and cover both happy paths and edge cases.

Added 14 tests for security.py achieving 100% coverage
Added 5 tests for telemetry.py achieving 81% coverage
Added 8 tests for logging.py improving coverage from 32% to 100%

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 9 comments.

File	Description
app/tests/test_telemetry.py	Tests for telemetry module covering setup_telemetry and log_request_metrics functions with various scenarios
app/tests/test_security.py	Tests for security module covering configuration validation, key generation, and health checks
app/tests/test_logging.py	Tests for logging module covering logger setup with different log levels and the get_logger function

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

app/tests/test_telemetry.py:4

Import of 'MagicMock' is not used.
Import of 'patch' is not used.

from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:55Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+"""Tests for telemetry module."""
+
+import logging
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch


The MagicMock and patch imports from unittest.mock are not used anywhere in this test file. These unused imports should be removed to keep the code clean.

Suggested change

from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:55Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        }
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            result = validate_production_config()
+            assert any("16 characters" in w for w in result["warnings"])


The assertion message checks for "16 characters" in the warning, but according to the security.py source code (line 47), the actual warning message says "at least 16 characters long". The test should check for the complete or more specific phrase to ensure it matches the actual warning message exactly.

Suggested change

assert any("16 characters" in w for w in result["warnings"])

assert any("at least 16 characters long" in w for w in result["warnings"])

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:55Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+                status_code=500,
+                duration_ms=100.0,
+            )
+        assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text


The assertion on line 69 uses an OR condition that will almost always pass. Since the test is checking for an error status code (500), the assertion should verify that "500" appears in the log output, not fall back to checking for "GET" which would be present in all GET requests. This makes the test less effective at catching issues with error status code logging.

Suggested change

assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text

assert "500" in caplog.text

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:56Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret", "API_KEY": ""}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)


The test patches the environment with a SECRET_KEY and API_KEY but then immediately removes API_KEY with os.environ.pop(). This creates confusion about the test's intent. The environment should either be set up correctly from the start (without API_KEY) or the patch.dict should not include it. The current approach unnecessarily patches then removes the value.

Suggested change

env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret", "API_KEY": ""}

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):

os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)

env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret"}

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:56Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        env = {"CORS_ORIGINS": "*", "API_KEY": "", "SECRET_KEY": ""}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)
+            os.environ.pop("SECRET_KEY", None)


Similar to the test_missing_api_key test, this test patches environment variables but then immediately removes them with os.environ.pop(). This is unnecessarily complex. The environment variables should simply not be included in the patch.dict in the first place if the goal is to test their absence.

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:56Z

app/tests/test_logging.py

+        # Verify only one handler exists
+        assert len(root.handlers) == 1
+
+


The test_setup_logging_clears_existing_handlers test has a flaw: it adds a dummy handler but then only checks that exactly one handler exists after setup_logging is called. This doesn't actually verify that the dummy handler was cleared - it only verifies the final count. The test would pass even if setup_logging never cleared handlers as long as it only added one handler. A more robust test would verify the handler identity or check that the dummy handler is no longer present.

Suggested change

# Verify only one handler exists

assert len(root.handlers) == 1

# Verify only one handler exists and dummy_handler is not present

assert len(root.handlers) == 1

assert dummy_handler not in root.handlers

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:56Z

app/tests/test_logging.py

+import os
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:56Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+import os
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:16:57Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+import logging
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging

976cc02

- test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%) - test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%) - test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%) - Cobertura total: 72% -> 96% - 34 tests passing

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 13, 2025 14:14

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of Neiland85 December 13, 2025 14:14 View session

Neiland85 merged commit 962e1e1 into main Dec 13, 2025
23 checks passed

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #113

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #113

Uh oh!

Neiland85 commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	assert any("16 characters" in w for w in result["warnings"])
	assert any("at least 16 characters long" in w for w in result["warnings"])

	assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text
	assert "500" in caplog.text

		# Verify only one handler exists
		assert len(root.handlers) == 1

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #113

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #113

Uh oh!

Conversation

Neiland85 commented Dec 13, 2025

🚀 Pull Request: Complete Railway Deployment Optimization

📋 Descripción del Cambio

🎯 Problema Solucionado

✅ Solución Implementada

🔧 Cambios Técnicos Implementados

🚂 Railway Deployment

📊 Admin Dashboard

🔄 CI/CD Pipeline

📚 Documentation Suite

🧪 Testing & Validation

✅ Funcionalidad Validada

🔒 Security Checks

⚡ Performance Tests

🎯 Business Impact

🚀 Deployment Instructions

Pre-merge Checklist

Post-merge Actions

👥 Review Requirements

🔍 Areas de Focus para Review

🎯 Expected Reviewers

📝 Additional Notes

🔄 Future Improvements

📚 Related Documentation

✅ Ready to Merge Criteria

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants