Handle Device conflicts between core schema and extensions

[stephprince]

Motivation

Fix #2108. Related to updates in hdmf-dev/hdmf#1309 that will warn a user when there are extension conflicts, these changes remap some of these conflicts on read.

• Remaps Device.model as a string attribute to a DeviceModel object on read.
• Remaps Device.model defined by other extensions to a Device.{extension_name}_model field to allow data from files with an older extension with a conflicting Device.model to be read.

Note - the tests will not pass until hdmf-dev/hdmf#1309 is merged since it raises a warning instead of an error if an extension attempts to overwrite an existing specification.

How to test the behavior?

Show how to reproduce the new behavior (can be a bug fix or a new feature)

Checklist

• Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
• Have you checked our Contributing document?
• Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
• Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running ruff check . && codespell from the source directory.
• Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.23%. Comparing base (6ff7e44) to head (851cb6f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2132      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.19%   95.23%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          28       29       +1     
  Lines        2851     2876      +25     
  Branches      736      740       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2714     2739      +25     
  Misses         83       83              
  Partials       54       54              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	74.44% <100.00%> (+0.39%)	⬆️
unit	84.94% <60.00%> (-0.22%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[stephprince]

@rly - see note in the PR description about the tests not passing until hdmf-dev/hdmf#1309 is merged, but otherwise this part should be ready for review

[stephprince]

@rly this is ready for review!

[rly]

Looks good!