channels: make nixpkgs-unstable primary#921
Open
fricklerhandwerk wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:mainfrom
Open
channels: make nixpkgs-unstable primary#921fricklerhandwerk wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:mainfrom
fricklerhandwerk wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:mainfrom
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Member
|
The only place using this which I found is the tarball mirroring script in this repo. That one currently requires that there's only one channel that's both stable and primary, so this wouldn't break that property. (and the script has been broken for other reasons for quite some time anyway) |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Mic92
force-pushed
the
nixpkgs-unstable-primary
branch
from
f360f56 to
e1ebdc3
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the Nixpkgs security tracker UI we want to aggregate variants under their primary channels.
This can only be approximated heuristically, but
channels.nixis authoritative and the closest to consistent we have.So I wondered why
nixpkgs-unstableis not primary. When this structure was established in #189, the field was simply ommited in #189 (comment).Am I missing something from the semantics of "primary" that would forbid this change?
What makes a channel primary anyway? That the maximum number of tests is run?