libutil: Use ThreadPool in computeClosure to parallelize promise resolution #14604
+41
−31
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Note: I'm not much of a C dev (yet), and don't know enough about the codebase to know if this is "safe."
I found this while looking at slower-than-expected HTTP Binary Cache store query times. This line immediately blocks on the
queryPathInfopromise when it is passed fromcomputeFSClosurehere. In the context of an HTTP binary cache store, this prevents HTTP requests from happening concurrently (HTTP2 or HTTP1).computeFSClosureandcomputeClosureare used in quite a few places--includingpath-info, which I used to benchmark just by querying the Linux stdenv build-time closure & adjustingnarinfo-cache-positive-ttl:Before:
After:
Context
Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.
The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.