workflows/check: run "checks" in one workflow#416369
Conversation
This introduces "check" as another category of jobs suitable for the "Require status checks to pass" feature. Checks as a category would include everything that is done before even looking at the code: Right branch? Commit messages? Cherry-picked correctly? (commit messages are not checked, yet)
|
Backport failed for Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts. git fetch origin release-24.11
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-416369-to-release-24.11 origin/release-24.11
cd .worktree/backport-416369-to-release-24.11
git switch --create backport-416369-to-release-24.11
git cherry-pick -x f11b58a7a099b701c3d929ea2cded036a0a5dafd |
|
Backport failed for Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts. git fetch origin release-25.05
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-416369-to-release-25.05 origin/release-25.05
cd .worktree/backport-416369-to-release-25.05
git switch --create backport-416369-to-release-25.05
git cherry-pick -x f11b58a7a099b701c3d929ea2cded036a0a5dafd |
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
|
FYI, the check seems to misunderstand the
See basically any complaint in #418358 (review) |
|
Thanks for the report, will look into this. I'd say it doesn't make sense to run the check cherry-picks workflow on the staging PRs at all. |
This introduces "check" as another category of jobs suitable for the "Require status checks to pass" feature.
Checks as a category would include everything that is done before even looking at the code: Right branch? Commit messages? Cherry-picked correctly?
(commit messages are not checked, yet)
Split off from #415006 to make review and merge in steps possible. See that PR for rationale.
Things done
Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.