Skip to content

nixos/prosody: add muc_moderation#431289

Merged
SuperSandro2000 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
SuperSandro2000:prosody-moderation
Aug 20, 2025
Merged

nixos/prosody: add muc_moderation#431289
SuperSandro2000 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
SuperSandro2000:prosody-moderation

Conversation

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tested on jabber.c3d2.de and we can now finally delete spam.

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Aug 5, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Aug 6, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Aug 14, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Aug 20, 2025
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit b151674 into NixOS:master Aug 20, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 deleted the prosody-moderation branch August 20, 2025 14:00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marijanp marijanp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be difficult to test whether the module is actually enabled in a nixos-test?

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Maybe we can test it via some cli or debugging output to see if it is loaded but not sure if that is really that useful.

For testing it e2e I currently lack the time to properly implement that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants