voxtype,voxtype-{vulkan,onnx}: init at 0.6.2 by DuskyElf · Pull Request #491124 · NixOS/nixpkgs

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T19:34:39Z

https://voxtype.io : Voice-to-text with push-to-talk, integrates nicely with Wayland compositors
repo: https://github.com/peteonrails/voxtype

Added 3 packages

voxtype
voxtype-vulkan
voxtype-onnx

CUDA and ROCm packages could be added later (I don't have a way to test them yet).

References used

The current release of the upstream doesn't support MacOS

Things done

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T19:37:25Z

Replaces: #480335 & #478040

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T19:38:56Z

@delafthi can you please review it? I'm new to packaging

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR adds three package variants of voxtype, a voice-to-text application with push-to-talk support for Wayland compositors. The package supports CPU-only and Vulkan-accelerated modes through different build features.

Changes:

Added voxtype package with configurable acceleration support (CPU or Vulkan)
Added voxtype-cpu and voxtype-vulkan variants in all-packages.nix
Referenced ollama package structure for handling acceleration variants

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix	Main package definition with acceleration parameter support for CPU and Vulkan modes
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix	Adds explicit variant definitions for voxtype-cpu and voxtype-vulkan

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T20:03:08Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 491124
Commit: 90ca35a06d361e27cac07d8562d9517e7bc4bea3 (subsequent changes)
Merge: bfa17e751ad1e18d17fc0a9cf88aeb5766e5c501

Logs: https://github.com/DuskyElf/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/22075697975

`x86_64-linux`

❌ 1 package failed to build:

voxtype-vulkan

✅ 1 package built:

voxtype (voxtype-cpu)

Error logs: `x86_64-linux`

voxtype-vulkan

        |                                                                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                                                                                          conv2d_f16_f32_data
  /build/source/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/build/whisper-rs-sys-4c8fa4213319674a/out/whisper.cpp/ggml/src/ggml-vulkan/ggml-vulkan.cpp:3244:71: error: 'conv2d_f32_len' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'conv2d_f16_f32_len'?
   3244 |                 device, device->pipeline_conv2d_f32[s], "conv2d_f32", conv2d_f32_len, conv2d_f32_data, "main", 3,
        |                                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                                                       conv2d_f16_f32_len
  /build/source/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/build/whisper-rs-sys-4c8fa4213319674a/out/whisper.cpp/ggml/src/ggml-vulkan/ggml-vulkan.cpp:3244:87: error: 'conv2d_f32_data' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'conv2d_f16_f32_data'?
   3244 |                 device, device->pipeline_conv2d_f32[s], "conv2d_f32", conv2d_f32_len, conv2d_f32_data, "main", 3,
        |                                                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                                                                       conv2d_f16_f32_data
  make[2]: *** [ggml/src/ggml-vulkan/CMakeFiles/ggml-vulkan.dir/build.make:219: ggml/src/ggml-vulkan/CMakeFiles/ggml-vulkan.dir/ggml-vulkan.cpp.o] Error 1
  make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:304: ggml/src/ggml-vulkan/CMakeFiles/ggml-vulkan.dir/all] Error 2
  make: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2
thread 'main' (2086) panicked at /build/voxtype-0.5.6-vendor/cmake-0.1.54/src/lib.rs:1119:5:
command did not execute successfully, got: exit status: 2
build script failed, must exit now

note: run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display a backtrace

`aarch64-linux`

✅ 2 packages built:

voxtype (voxtype-cpu)
voxtype-vulkan

`x86_64-darwin`

✅ No rebuilds

`aarch64-darwin`

✅ No rebuilds

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T20:22:35Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 491124
Commit: 90ca35a06d361e27cac07d8562d9517e7bc4bea3

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 2 packages built:

voxtype (voxtype-cpu)
voxtype-vulkan

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T20:23:32Z

How come it builds fine locally but not on github actions via nixpkgs-review-gha ?

delafthi · 2026-02-16T20:30:27Z

@delafthi can you please review it? I'm new to packaging

I had a quick look and at first glance it seems good. I'll review it tomorrow.

delafthi · 2026-02-16T20:33:02Z

How come it builds fine locally but not on github actions via nixpkgs-review-gha ?

I'm not sure but does vulkan stuff depend on hardware (gpus)? That might not be available on the action runners. Probably not - I see you have all the vulkan stuff. I'll have a look tomorrow.

DuskyElf · 2026-02-16T20:39:39Z

does vulkan stuff depend on hardware (gpus)?

I believe it shouldn't depend at build time ...
Also the aarch64 package built fine even on Github runners

leiserfg · 2026-02-17T09:20:02Z

I'm not sure but does vulkan stuff depend on hardware (gpus)?

Vulkan has two parts, this links against the interface, the runtime is loaded dynamically. So this is fine.

By the way, 0.6.0 is out.

leiserfg · 2026-02-17T09:25:23Z

I'm not sure if this should include wtype and wl-clipboard, as they are only useful in some DM, the tool itself has many other backends, and they are all taken from PATH. IMHO it's better to leave that to the final user.

delafthi

About the issue with CI/nixpkgs-review-gha. The build fails when compiling whisper-cpp. I had a look at the package declaration in nixpkgs and there is this:

nixpkgs/pkgs/by-name/wh/whisper-cpp/package.nix

Lines 140 to 144 in a82ccc3

    
           ++ optionals (isx86 && !isStatic) [ 
        
             (cmakeBool "GGML_BACKEND_DL" true) 
        
             (cmakeBool "GGML_CPU_ALL_VARIANTS" true) 
        
             (cmakeFeature "GGML_BACKEND_DIR" "${placeholder "out"}/lib") 
        
           ]

Maybe we're hitting that on GHA runners.

delafthi · 2026-02-17T09:32:25Z

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix

+  vulkan-loader,
+
+  # one of `[ null false "vulkan" ]`
+  acceleration ? null,


I think I would rather go with:

Suggested change

acceleration ? null,

vulkanSupport ? false,

<packages for vulkanSupport>

rocmSupport ? false,

<packages for rocmSupport>

cudaSupport ? false,

<packages for cudaSupport>

(This is just a suggestion - just add the acceleration you want to support.)

This seems to be a common pattern ( see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-unstable/pkgs/development/python-modules/torch/source/default.nix or https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-unstable/pkgs/by-name/wh/whisper-cpp/package.nix)

I saw that acceleration pattern in ollama here -

nixpkgs/pkgs/by-name/ol/ollama/package.nix

Lines 38 to 39 in 36e6063

# one of `[ null false "rocm" "cuda" "vulkan" ]`

acceleration ? null,

delafthi · 2026-02-17T09:40:50Z

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix

+assert builtins.elem acceleration [
+  null
+  false
+  "vulkan"
+];


Change the asserts accordingly. I'm not sure if only one of the acc-backend features can be enabled. Maybe all of them can be enabled - then you could just remove the assert.

delafthi · 2026-02-17T09:44:42Z

pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix

+  voxtype-cpu = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = false; };
+  voxtype-vulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = "vulkan"; };


~~Also the naming <package>With<feature> seems to be common. I would change to that.~~

Suggested change

voxtype-cpu = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = false; };

voxtype-vulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = "vulkan"; };

voxtypeWithVulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { vulkanSupport = true; };

Though whisper-cpp uses the dash version, ollama as well 🙈

delafthi · 2026-02-17T09:45:24Z

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix

+      "Voice-to-text with push-to-talk for Wayland compositors"
+      + lib.optionalString vulkanEnabled ", using Vulkan for generic GPU acceleration";


I would just have a single description without the optional part.

delafthi · 2026-02-17T09:49:39Z

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix

+    cmake
+    clang
+    pkg-config
+    makeWrapper


Please use makeBinaryWrapper.

https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#fun-makeWrapper

Using the makeBinaryWrapper implementation is usually preferred, as it creates a tiny compiled wrapper executable, that ...

It uses wrapProgram and not makeWapper, and it needs those extra --prefix argument

makeBinaryWrapper also provides wrapProgram. Just include makeBinaryWrapper in nativeBuildInputs - you don't have to change anything in your postInstall hook.

delafthi · 2026-02-17T10:10:37Z

I'm not sure if this should include wtype and wl-clipboard, as they are only useful in some DM, the tool itself has many other backends, and they are all taken from PATH. IMHO it's better to leave that to the final user.

I agree, this seems unflexible. A possible solution would be to have a waylandPackages option as argument which defaults to the packages suggested by voxtype, but allows the user to override them using voxtype.override { waylandPackages = [...]}. Another solution would be to leave that to a configuration module (nixpkgs or home-manager).

leiserfg · 2026-02-17T10:14:55Z

Another solution would be to leave that to a configuration module (nixpkgs or home-manager).

I think this is the best option.

DuskyElf · 2026-02-17T16:06:54Z

About the issue with CI/nixpkgs-review-gha. The build fails when compiling whisper-cpp. I had a look at the package declaration in nixpkgs and there is this:

nixpkgs/pkgs/by-name/wh/whisper-cpp/package.nix

Lines 140 to 144 in a82ccc3

++ optionals (isx86 && !isStatic) [

(cmakeBool "GGML_BACKEND_DL" true)

(cmakeBool "GGML_CPU_ALL_VARIANTS" true)

(cmakeFeature "GGML_BACKEND_DIR" "${placeholder "out"}/lib")

]

Maybe we're hitting that on GHA runners.

What possible fixes are there for us?

nbCloud91 · 2026-02-17T16:08:58Z

0.6.0 added a lot of new binaries, and you can see this open PR by the creator to bring those to the upstream flake.nix

leiserfg · 2026-02-17T16:28:37Z

What possible fixes are there for us?

Doing the same here should work.

leiserfg · 2026-02-17T16:32:24Z

6.0.0 added a lot of new binaries and you can see this open PR by the creator to bring those to the upstream flake.nix

I think to avoid blowing up the amount of packages/builds keeping only no gpu / vulkan packages and having the other as optional attributes. That will limit the package to be whisper only (unless recompiled) but if someone wanna try they can always override.

DuskyElf · 2026-02-17T17:17:15Z

6.0.0 added a lot of new binaries and you can see this open PR by the creator to bring those to the upstream flake.nix

I think to avoid blowing up the amount of packages/builds keeping only no gpu / vulkan packages and having the other as optional attributes. That will limit the package to be whisper only (unless recompiled) but if someone wanna try they can always override.

alright, that makes sense

DuskyElf · 2026-02-17T17:17:56Z

What possible fixes are there for us?

Doing the same here should work.

Can you please clarify -- doing what? --, I'm unable to understand

delafthi · 2026-02-17T18:07:40Z

What possible fixes are there for us?

Doing the same here should work.

Can you please clarify -- doing what? --, I'm unable to understand

~~Setting the cmake variables I marked or maybe just adding whisper-cpp as buildInput. Though, I'm not sure if cargo will pick that up.~~

~~Though, I'm not exactly sure how to achieve that.~~

Edit: A look into the CMakeLists.txt documentation of whisper-cpp indicates that the previously mentioned CMake options are not applicable to this issue.

delafthi · 2026-02-17T20:33:22Z

@DuskyElf Maybe that will help: https://codeberg.org/tazz4843/whisper-rs#troubleshooting

I get a panic during binding generation build!

You can attempt to fix it yourself, or you can set the WHISPER_DONT_GENERATE_BINDINGS environment variable.
This skips attempting to build the bindings whatsoever and copies the existing ones. They may be out of date, but it's better than nothing.

WHISPER_DONT_GENERATE_BINDINGS=1 cargo build

peteonrails · 2026-02-19T04:02:42Z

Hi! 👋

I am the upstream maintainer of voxtype, and I feel like I might be creating more problems than I'm solving for NixOS users. I know very little about packaging and publishing for NixOS. Would y'all be open to a discussion on a strategy going forward for me to not cause you a lot of work when new releases are published?

By way of example, I've opened a PR to add @DuskyElf as a code owner on the NixOS packaging files in the voxtype repo (peteonrails/voxtype#226). Would it be useful for you to have collaborator access to the repo so you can help keep the in-repo flake and the nixpkgs package in sync without needing a review from me?

A couple of notes on the PR:

The current release is v0.6.2 (this PR targets v0.5.6)
Since v0.5.6, we added meeting mode, SenseVoice, and several other ONNX engines alongside Parakeet
The flake now derives its version from Cargo.toml instead of hardcoding it

Happy to help with anything you need for the nixpkgs packaging, and happy to figure out how best to work together.

DuskyElf · 2026-02-19T06:56:17Z

Hi @peteonrails,

Thanks for reaching out, I’m happy to collaborate. I’m also new to nixpkgs packaging. A discussion sounds great such that we keep both the flake.nix (of the upstream) and nixpkgs package (here) in sync with the releases.

I use Voxtype daily with my Wayland compositor and it’s been really helpful. I haven’t tried the newer features (like meeting mode) yet, but I’ll test them soon.

Welcome to nixpkgs, and thanks again for the great project!

delafthi · 2026-02-19T07:50:01Z

@peteonrails I don’t think you’re making things difficult for the packagers - it’s perfectly normal for a fast-moving package to undergo frequent changes that require more effort to maintain downstream.

delafthi · 2026-02-21T12:15:04Z

@DuskyElf have a look at #492111 I created a derivation based on the existing one at peteonrails/voxtype. Feel free to take wathever you need into this PR. I'll close it when this has been merged. I just tested the build and not the binary.

Would be nice to also support cuda/rocm and darwin platforms in the future.

DuskyElf · 2026-02-21T17:09:07Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review

`x86_64-linux`

❌ 1 package failed to build:

voxtype-vulkan

✅ 2 packages built:

voxtype
voxtype-onnx

error building voxtype-vulkan -

CMake Error at /nix/store/lxkvigfj5xy6w2bs7h4xwr3d7wb7piqb-cmake-4.1.2/share/cmake-4.1/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:227 (message):
  Could NOT find Vulkan (missing: glslc) (found version "1.4.335")

glslc is the shaderc package

DuskyElf · 2026-02-21T18:06:05Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 491124
Commit: d4480a5689704cfe8f6182428cdd9f84fa1825f5 (subsequent changes)
Merge: 22fc83aae9f7808e5ca1882aa556c3a2bea3b331

Logs: https://github.com/DuskyElf/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/22261314297

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 3 packages built:

voxtype
voxtype-onnx
voxtype-vulkan

`aarch64-linux`

❌ 2 packages failed to build:

voxtype
voxtype-onnx

✅ 1 package built:

voxtype-vulkan

Error logs: `aarch64-linux`

voxtype

test text::tests::test_spoken_punctuation_case_insensitive ... ok test text::tests::test_spoken_punctuation_multi_word ... ok

failures:

---- output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming stdout ----

thread 'output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming' (4719) panicked at src/output/post_process.rs:238:9:
assertion left == right failed
left: "ignored"
right: "hello"
note: run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display a backtrace

failures:
output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming

test result: FAILED. 482 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.75s

error: test failed, to rerun pass --lib

voxtype-onnx

test vad::tests::test_whisper_vad_model_url ... ok test vad::whisper_vad::tests::test_threshold_clamping ... ok

failures:

---- output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming stdout ----

thread 'output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming' (6549) panicked at src/output/post_process.rs:238:9:
assertion left == right failed
left: "ignored"
right: "hello"
note: run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display a backtrace

failures:
output::post_process::tests::test_whitespace_trimming

test result: FAILED. 528 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.74s

error: test failed, to rerun pass --lib

`x86_64-darwin`

✅ No rebuilds

`aarch64-darwin`

✅ No rebuilds

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 16, 2026 19:34

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of DuskyElf February 16, 2026 19:35 View session

nixpkgs-ci bot added 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. labels Feb 16, 2026

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

pkgs/by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved

DuskyElf force-pushed the voxtype branch from 471f69b to 90ca35a Compare February 16, 2026 19:46

nixpkgs-ci bot added the 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. label Feb 16, 2026

DuskyElf requested review from andresilva and ilkecan February 16, 2026 19:54

nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. label Feb 16, 2026

DuskyElf closed this Feb 16, 2026

DuskyElf reopened this Feb 16, 2026

delafthi reviewed Feb 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

DuskyElf marked this pull request as draft February 19, 2026 02:34

DuskyElf force-pushed the voxtype branch from 90ca35a to eaa2c76 Compare February 21, 2026 17:02

DuskyElf changed the title ~~voxtype,voxtype-{cpu,vulkan}: init at 0.5.6~~ voxtype,voxtype-{vulkan,onnx}: init at 0.6.2 Feb 21, 2026

voxtype,voxtype-{vulkan,onnx}: init at 0.6.2

d4480a5

DuskyElf force-pushed the voxtype branch from eaa2c76 to d4480a5 Compare February 21, 2026 17:42

	++ optionals (isx86 && !isStatic) [
	(cmakeBool "GGML_BACKEND_DL" true)
	(cmakeBool "GGML_CPU_ALL_VARIANTS" true)
	(cmakeFeature "GGML_BACKEND_DIR" "${placeholder "out"}/lib")
	]

-  acceleration ? null,
+  vulkanSupport ? false,
+  <packages for vulkanSupport>
+  rocmSupport ? false,
+  <packages for rocmSupport>
+  cudaSupport ? false,
+  <packages for cudaSupport>

	# one of `[ null false "rocm" "cuda" "vulkan" ]`
	acceleration ? null,

		voxtype-cpu = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = false; };
		voxtype-vulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = "vulkan"; };

	voxtype-cpu = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = false; };
	voxtype-vulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { acceleration = "vulkan"; };
	voxtypeWithVulkan = callPackage ../by-name/vo/voxtype/package.nix { vulkanSupport = true; };

		"Voice-to-text with push-to-talk for Wayland compositors"
		+ lib.optionalString vulkanEnabled ", using Vulkan for generic GPU acceleration";

Uh oh!

Comments

Conversation

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Added 3 packages

References used

Things done

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

aarch64-linux

x86_64-darwin

aarch64-darwin

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

delafthi commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

delafthi commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

leiserfg commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

leiserfg commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

delafthi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DuskyElf Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DuskyElf Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

delafthi commented Feb 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

leiserfg commented Feb 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`aarch64-linux`

`x86_64-darwin`

`aarch64-darwin`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

delafthi commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

DuskyElf commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

delafthi Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

delafthi commented Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

leiserfg commented Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

nbCloud91 commented Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

leiserfg commented Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

delafthi commented Feb 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

peteonrails commented Feb 19, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`aarch64-linux`

`x86_64-darwin`

`aarch64-darwin`