Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 16 additions & 6 deletions doc/constitution.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -173,9 +173,12 @@ One option is to use [proportional representation mode from Condorcet Internet V

In any election where seats with different end-of-term dates are available, winning candidates with higher final election rankings are appointed to the longer terms.

#### Special considerations for the first SC election
#### Initial Elections

- To stagger the terms, the first election will appoint half the members rounded up with 2-year terms and the remaining members with 1-year terms.
An initial election of the entire SC must appoint half the members rounded up with 2-year terms and the remaining members with 1-year terms.
This occurs with the first SC election, and also may occur in the event the SC is [dissolved](#full-reelections).

Additionally, the following rules apply to the very first election:
- The EC for the first election will be the members of the [Nix Constitutional Assembly (NCA)](https://github.com/nixos/nix-constitutional-assembly?tab=readme-ov-file#members), which are thus ineligible to be elected for the first SC
- All nominees become candidates for the first election, because there's no existing SC that would decide over disqualifying candidates.
- And to help the first elected SC establish itself, members of the NCA are integrated into the SC as non-voting members for 6 months after the appointment.
Expand All @@ -193,18 +196,22 @@ After all candidates are known and before the voting period starts, the EC must
Furthermore, there is a hard maximum of two members with the same CoI at any time.
If this condition is suspected to be violated because of job changes, acquisitions, or other events, all non-involved currently serving SC members will have a simple majority decision over whether there is a violation.
In case it is deemed a violation, sufficient members of the committee must resign until the max representation limit is achieved.
If it is impossible to find sufficient members to resign, all members with that same CoI will be removed and a new special election shall be held.
If it is impossible to find sufficient members to resign, all members with that same CoI will be removed and a new [special election] shall be held.

#### Special Elections

In the event of a resignation or other loss of a steering committee member (including a [removal for conduct](#removal-for-conduct)), a special election for that position may be held if the SC deems it necessary, or the SC does not have half of the normal size.
Otherwise, the missing positions are assumed to be abstaining from all the SC votes.
In the event of resignations or other loss of steering committee members (including [removals for conduct](#removal-for-conduct)), the SC would have less than all 7 seats filled.

When one or more seats are vacant, a special election may be held for those vacant seats.
Otherwise, the missing seats are assumed to be abstaining from all the SC votes.
A committee member elected in a special election will serve out the remainder of the term of the person they are replacing, regardless of the length of that remainder.

A special election for vacant seats may be held if the SC deems it necessary, or the SC does not have half of the normal size.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sentence is unclear (but it was before already). If the SC does not have half the normal size, may a special election be held or must it be? I think the latter is intended.

(possibly out of scope here)

Copy link
Member Author

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 Nov 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is in scope if we want it to be :). My view matches yours: it must be held.

Here's a suggestion

Suggested change
A special election for vacant seats may be held if the SC deems it necessary, or the SC does not have half of the normal size.
When a seat a vacated, a special election might be planned.
If the majority of the seats are still filled, the SC decides whether or hold a special election for vacant seats.
If only minority of seats are still filled, either a special election or the dissolution of the entire SC (which is always something that may be voted on) must happen.


#### Full Reelections

A simple majority within the SC may call a reelection of the entire SC based on perceived loss of confidence.
In this case, it also has to be decided whether this election is considered a special election for the remainders of all the corresponding terms, or an initial election for full 2-year terms for half of the seats rounded up and 1-year half-terms for the remaining seats.
In this case, it also has to be decided whether this election is considered a [special election] for the remainders of all the corresponding terms, or an [initial election] for full 2-year terms for half of the seats rounded up and 1-year half-terms for the remaining seats.
Vacant seats vote in favour of reelection, and between initial election and special election they count towards special election.

### Removal for conduct
Expand All @@ -214,3 +221,6 @@ The reasons include but are not limited to unfitting conduct and unavailability,
The SC is explicitly expected to be held to higher standards than applied to project communication in general.

The removal can be justification for a special election where the removed person is not eligible to be a candidate.

[special election]: #special-elections
[initial election]: #special-elections
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems wrong.