Skip to content

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Member

@handrews handrews commented Aug 24, 2025

See PR #4899.

Technically no schema changes are needed (validation works correctly as-is), but they are possible to more clearly specify the default.

  • schema changes are included in this pull request
  • schema changes are needed for this pull request but not done yet
  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

@handrews handrews requested review from a team as code owners August 24, 2025 20:13
@handrews handrews added the clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec label Aug 24, 2025
@handrews handrews added this to the v3.1.2 milestone Aug 24, 2025
miqui
miqui previously approved these changes Aug 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I am more confused by the new text than the original.

Copy link
Contributor

@mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! 👍

@handrews handrews merged commit 3009102 into OAI:v3.1-dev Aug 26, 2025
2 checks passed
@handrews
Copy link
Member Author

I'll re-port the changes to 3.2 as part of the section reorganization (separate commits, maybe separate PRs, still working on how to push all of that through, but I don't want to open another 3.2 PR right now b/c that will further delay the reorg).

@handrews handrews deleted the enc-style-defaults-31 branch August 27, 2025 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants