ci: add qa-simulation to runs - v1

[jufajardini]

Related to
Task #7885

Ticket

Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/

Related to https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7885 -- in the sense that we should have qa-simulation enabled...

[catenacyber]

Good to enable on the 2 out of 3

I wonder if SV CI should run all the tests, meaning one of the builds should disable ja3...

[jufajardini]

Good to enable on the 2 out of 3

I wonder if SV CI should run all the tests, meaning one of the builds should disable ja3...

Like we have for Suri CI?

[catenacyber]

Good to enable on the 2 out of 3
I wonder if SV CI should run all the tests, meaning one of the builds should disable ja3...

Like we have for Suri CI?

I do not think we have that for suri CI : "that" being sure that "CI should run all the tests"

[jufajardini]

Good to enable on the 2 out of 3
I wonder if SV CI should run all the tests, meaning one of the builds should disable ja3...

Like we have for Suri CI?

I do not think we have that for suri CI : "that" being sure that "CI should run all the tests"

Ah, I meant the Suri build that has ja3 and ja4 disabled :P (Fedora (non-root, debug, clang, asan, wshadow, rust-strict, no-ja)

[catenacyber]

Wondering if I should create a ticket about "CI should make sure it runs all the SV tests"

[jasonish]

Wondering if I should create a ticket about "CI should make sure it runs all the SV tests"

Would this require some cross-branch checking? For example, you might have to run main, 8.0.x and 7.0.x to really see? And stash the reports somewhere, and correlate after?

[catenacyber]

Wondering if I should create a ticket about "CI should make sure it runs all the SV tests"

Would this require some cross-branch checking?

I think we can manage to have something for main branch only, but it requires multiple Suricata builds (at least one with and one without ja3)

[jufajardini]

Wondering if I should create a ticket about "CI should make sure it runs all the SV tests"

Would this require some cross-branch checking?

I think we can manage to have something for main branch only, but it requires multiple Suricata builds (at least one with and one without ja3)

a new ticket seems appropriate, I think. I was trying to see if I could do this and it took me longer than expected.

• ja with
• ja without
• geoip
• liblz4

Were the ones that seemed to be "missing".

I had a hard time finding the package for liblz4 for my Ubuntu 24.04 install, for some reason (didn't manage to, so far).

[jufajardini]

Followed by: #2994