Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for the pull request @luhuadong. Would agree that having the LICENSE file in the GitHub repository would encourage people to contribute to this project (even though the process for contributing back to the kits has not yet been finalised). Depending on if the maintainers think it would be a useful thing, am sure they would be happy if you made the same pull request to the other repos. Probably best to wait to see if a maintainer agrees before doing the work or reach out in the feedback channel of the discord if you haven't done so already - https://discordapp.com/invite/cGZ5hKP |
Contributor
|
Can any of the maintainers advise on this pull request? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I saw the file
0. Start/License & Disclaimer .pdfsays "all of our content is licensed by Stichting One Army under a Creative Commons Attribution - Sharealike International 4.0. License (CC BY-SA 4.0)". So I think we need a CC BY-SA 4.0 LICENSE file, make it look more like an open source project.