Add Automated Bounty Payment System for Merged Pull Requests #4903
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 0
|
👋 Hi @Nachiket-Roy! This pull request needs a peer review before it can be merged. Please request a review from a team member who is not:
Once a valid peer review is submitted, this check will pass automatically. Thank you! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Nachiket-Roy has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughAdded AutoPay environment variables, a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub PR
participant View as views/user.py
participant Utils as bitcoin_utils.py
participant API as BCH Provider API
participant DB as Database
participant Notify as Notifications
GH->>View: PR merged event
View->>View: extract_bounty_from_labels(labels)
alt bounty label present
View->>View: check_existing_payment(repo, pr_number)
alt no existing payment
View->>View: resolve user BCH address
alt address present
View->>View: convert USD→BCH
View->>Utils: send_bch_payment(address, bch_amount)
Utils->>API: POST /payment (BCH_API_KEY)
alt API returns tx_id
API-->>Utils: {tx_id}
Utils-->>View: tx_id
View->>DB: record_payment(pr, tx_id, amounts)
View->>GH: post_payment_comment(tx_id, amount)
else API error
API-->>Utils: error
Utils-->>View: raise
View->>Notify: notify_admin_payment_failure(pr, error)
end
else missing address
View->>Notify: notify_user_missing_address(user, pr)
end
else duplicate payment -> View: skip payment
end
else no bounty -> View: no-op
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
website/views/user.py (1)
986-1013: Critical: Do not run autopay while GitHub signature validation is disabled
github_webhookis currently accepting unauthenticated POSTs (@csrf_exempt) and the HMAC signature check is commented out (Lines 986–994). With the new logic:
handle_pull_request_eventnow callsprocess_bounty_paymentwhenever it seesaction == "closed"andpull_request["merged"]and a$Nbounty label on the PR.process_bounty_paymentthen selects the user’s BCH address and actually initiates a payment viasend_crypto_payment.Without enforcing the GitHub signature (
X-Hub-Signature-256) or some equivalent authentication, anyone who can reach this endpoint can forge a payload that:
- Pretends a PR on any repo was merged.
- Includes arbitrary
labelslike"$500"to drive the bounty amount.- Spoofs
pull_request["user"]["html_url"]to direct funds to any account in your system with a BCH address.That turns this endpoint into a remotely triggerable money transfer API.
This must be addressed before enabling real payouts:
- Re‑enable and fix the signature validation so only genuine GitHub webhook events are accepted, and reject requests without a valid signature with 403.
- Consider failing the entire request with a non‑200 response when validation fails instead of silently proceeding.
- Only call
process_bounty_paymentafter signature verification passes.Until that is in place, I’d strongly recommend gating all payment behavior behind a hard
settings.PAYMENT_ENABLEDcheck that defaults toFalsein production.Also applies to: 1018-1033, 1159-1214
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.env.example (1)
46-50: Clarify AutoPay env semantics, defaults, and quotingRight now the example leaves some important things ambiguous and slightly unsafe by default:
MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT=50doesn’t specify units (USD? BCH? per‑PR cap?), but the code treats bounty amounts as crypto; this should be explicitly documented to avoid misconfiguration.PAYMENT_ENABLEDis shown astruein the example; given this controls real payouts, it’s safer if the example uses a disabled default (false) so new deployments don’t accidentally enable autopay.send_bch_paymentusessettings.BCH_PAYMENT_API_URL, but this variable isn’t documented here; it should be added with a placeholder so the example is complete.- To satisfy
dotenv-linterand avoid surprises when values contain special characters, consider quoting these values, e.g.:PAYMENT_ENABLED="false" MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT="50" BCH_API_KEY="your_payment_provider_api_key" BCH_WALLET_ADDRESS="your_sponsor_wallet_address" BCH_PAYMENT_API_URL="https://example-bch-provider/api/payments"Also consider adding a trailing newline for linting cleanliness, but that’s cosmetic.
website/bitcoin_utils.py (1)
64-110: Tighten error handling and exception types insend_bch_paymentThe happy‑path logic (basic address validation, 8‑decimal formatting, provider call, tx id check) looks reasonable, but the error path can be improved:
- You currently raise generic
Exceptionin several places and lose the original exception context:
- Network/provider errors (
RequestException) are re‑raised asException("BCH network/payment provider unreachable").- Non‑200 responses, provider “error” fields, and missing
transaction_idalso raise genericException.- This makes it harder to distinguish between transient network issues, provider errors, and coding/config errors when debugging or reacting upstream.
Consider introducing a dedicated exception type (e.g.,
BchPaymentError) and chaining the original exception where applicable:class BchPaymentError(Exception): pass def send_bch_payment(address, amount): ... try: response = requests.post(url, json=payload, headers=headers, timeout=10) except requests.exceptions.RequestException as exc: logger.exception("BCH payment request failed") raise BchPaymentError("BCH network/payment provider unreachable") from exc if response.status_code != 200: logger.error("BCH payment failed (%s): %s", response.status_code, response.text) raise BchPaymentError(f"BCH payment failed: {response.text}") try: data = response.json() except ValueError as exc: logger.exception("Invalid JSON in BCH payment response") raise BchPaymentError("Invalid BCH payment response (non‑JSON)") from exc ...This keeps logs richer (
logger.exception) and lets callers handleBchPaymentErrorexplicitly without conflating it with unrelated exceptions.website/views/user.py (1)
1211-1213: Improve exception logging and granularity inprocess_bounty_paymentCatching a broad
Exceptionmakes sense here to avoid crashing webhook handling on payment/provider issues, but you currently:
- Log with
logger.error(f"Payment failed for PR #{pr_number}: {str(e)}"), which loses the stack trace.- Then call
notify_admin_payment_failure, which itself can raise (e.g., mail backend issues) and isn’t wrapped.Consider:
- Using
logger.exception("Payment failed for PR #%s", pr_number)so the stack trace is preserved.- Narrowing the
exceptto the types you actually expect (BchPaymentError,requests.exceptions.RequestException,ValueErrorfor bad addresses, etc.) oncesend_bch_paymentexposes a dedicated exception, so unrelated bugs don’t silently masquerade as “payment failure”.- Optionally wrapping
notify_admin_payment_failurein a smalltry/exceptinside this block so email failures don’t cause a 500 on the webhook.These changes won’t alter the core behavior but will make operational debugging much easier.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.env.example(1 hunks)website/bitcoin_utils.py(2 hunks)website/views/user.py(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
.env.example
[warning] 50-50: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
(EndingBlankLine)
[warning] 50-50: [UnorderedKey] The MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT key should go before the PAYMENT_ENABLED key
(UnorderedKey)
[warning] 50-50: [ValueWithoutQuotes] This value needs to be surrounded in quotes
(ValueWithoutQuotes)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
website/bitcoin_utils.py
73-73: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
87-87: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
87-87: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
88-88: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
88-88: Create your own exception
(TRY002)
88-88: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
93-93: Create your own exception
(TRY002)
93-93: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
100-100: Create your own exception
(TRY002)
100-100: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
106-106: Create your own exception
(TRY002)
106-106: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
website/views/user.py
1070-1070: Unpacked variable created is never used
Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern
(RUF059)
1211-1211: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1212-1212: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1212-1212: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
website/views/user.py (1)
4-8: New imports and model usage look appropriate
re,Decimal,requests, and theRepomodel are all used in the new bounty/autopay helpers (label parsing, amount handling, GitHub comment posting, and repo lookup). Nothing extraneous here; import placement and usage are consistent with the rest of the module.Also applies to: 54-54
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Backlog
to Ready
in 📌 OWASP BLT Project Board
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 2
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
website/views/user.py (2)
139-140: Remove unnecessary fallback: authenticated users always have usernames.Line 139 adds a fallback to
"default_username", but earlier code (line 121) already accessesrequest.user.userprofile, which requires authentication. Ifrequest.useris not authenticated, the code would fail earlier. Additionally, authenticated Django users always have ausername, so theor "default_username"clause is unnecessary and could mask bugs.Apply this diff:
- username = request.user.username or "default_username" + username = request.user.username return redirect(reverse("profile", args=[username]))
1226-1229: Uselogging.exceptionin exception handlers for better debugging.Lines 1227 and 1283 use
logging.errorwithin exception handlers. When logging exceptions, preferlogging.exception, which automatically includes the stack trace, making debugging significantly easier.Apply this diff:
except Exception as e: - logger.error(f"Unable to fetch BCH price: {e}") + logger.exception("Unable to fetch BCH price") notify_admin_payment_failure(pr_data, "Unable to fetch BCH/USD rate") returnAnd:
except Exception as e: - logger.error(f"Payment failed for PR #{pr_number}: {str(e)}") + logger.exception(f"Payment failed for PR #{pr_number}") notify_admin_payment_failure(pr_data, str(e))Note:
logging.exceptionautomatically includes exception details, so you don't need to passeexplicitly.Also applies to: 1282-1284
.env.example (1)
46-50: Add proper formatting for environment variables.The new AutoPay variables are correctly defined, but need minor formatting improvements for consistency and best practices:
- Missing final newline (line 50): Environment files should end with a newline
- Unquoted numeric value (line 50): While
50works unquoted, quoting it as"50"maintains consistency with other values and prevents shell interpretation issues- Variable ordering (optional): Consider placing
PAYMENT_ENABLEDbeforeMAX_AUTO_PAYMENTfor alphabetical consistencyApply this diff:
#AutoPay Bounty BCH_API_KEY=your_payment_provider_api_key BCH_WALLET_ADDRESS=your_sponsor_wallet_address -PAYMENT_ENABLED=False -MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT=50 # Maximum amount for automatic payment +PAYMENT_ENABLED="False" +MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT="50" # Maximum amount for automatic payment (USD) +Note: Added clarification that MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT is in USD to match the implementation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.env.example(1 hunks)website/views/user.py(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
.env.example
[warning] 50-50: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
(EndingBlankLine)
[warning] 50-50: [UnorderedKey] The MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT key should go before the PAYMENT_ENABLED key
(UnorderedKey)
[warning] 50-50: [ValueWithoutQuotes] This value needs to be surrounded in quotes
(ValueWithoutQuotes)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
website/views/user.py
1061-1061: Unused function argument: bch_amount
(ARG001)
1070-1070: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1226-1226: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1227-1227: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1282-1282: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1283-1283: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1283-1283: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (10)
website/views/user.py (10)
4-4: LGTM: New imports support the bounty payment functionality.All new imports are properly utilized in the payment workflow (regex for label parsing, Decimal for precise currency calculations, requests for API calls, transaction for atomic DB operations, and Repo for repository tracking).
Also applies to: 6-6, 8-8, 19-19, 54-54
1017-1032: LGTM: Clean integration of bounty detection into PR merge workflow.The enhancement properly detects merged PRs, extracts bounty amounts from labels, and triggers the payment flow only when bounty labels are present. The flow integrates smoothly with the existing badge assignment logic.
1036-1042: LGTM: Robust label parsing with precise decimal handling.The regex pattern correctly matches bounty labels (e.g.,
$5,$10.50) and usesDecimalfor precise currency arithmetic, avoiding floating-point errors.
1045-1058: LGTM: Clean abstraction for payment provider integration.The function provides a clear interface for cryptocurrency payments. The conditional import of
send_bch_paymentis appropriate, and theNotImplementedErrorfor unsupported currencies makes future expansion straightforward.
1123-1151: LGTM: Well-structured PR comment with transaction details.The function properly formats and posts payment confirmation comments to GitHub PRs. Good practices include:
- Request timeout to prevent hanging (line 1150)
- Blockchain explorer link for transparency (line 1136)
- Proper error handling via status code check (line 1151)
1154-1167: LGTM: Clear email notification for missing payment addresses.The email provides actionable instructions for users to add their BCH address, with proper settings references for URL and sender email.
1170-1181: LGTM: Proper repo allow-listing now prevents payments to untracked repositories.The function now correctly returns
True(treat as ineligible) when a repo is not tracked (lines 1173-1175), addressing the security concern from previous reviews. This ensures payments are only made for explicitly tracked repositories.
1199-1215: Excellent: Safety gates now properly implemented!The addition of
PAYMENT_ENABLEDandMAX_AUTO_PAYMENTchecks addresses critical concerns from previous reviews. The implementation correctly:
- Early-returns when payments are disabled (lines 1200-1202)
- Validates the MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT setting and converts it to Decimal (line 1207)
- Compares USD amounts against the limit before proceeding (lines 1208-1215)
This prevents accidental payments in non-production environments and caps automatic payouts to protect against excessive costs.
1217-1229: Excellent: Currency conversion from USD to BCH now implemented!The code now properly addresses the critical unit mismatch issue raised in previous reviews. Instead of sending
$5as literal5 BCH, the flow:
- Fetches real-time BCH/USD exchange rate from CoinGecko (lines 1218-1223)
- Converts USD bounty amount to BCH:
bch_amount = usd_amount / rate(line 1225)- Handles API failures gracefully with admin notification (lines 1226-1229)
This ensures bounty labels like
$5are correctly interpreted as $5 USD worth of BCH, not 5 BCH.
1231-1285: LGTM: Comprehensive payment processing with proper validation and error handling.The payment flow is well-structured:
- ✅ Address validation (lines 1240-1244)
- ✅ Duplicate payment prevention (lines 1246-1252)
- ✅ Detailed logging at each step (lines 1256-1260, 1277-1280)
- ✅ Transaction recording and PR commenting (lines 1265-1275)
- ✅ Error handling with admin notifications (lines 1282-1284)
The implementation follows security best practices and handles edge cases appropriately.
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 1
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
website/views/user.py (1)
1194-1283: Excellent: All previous safety concerns addressed, minor logging improvements needed.The function now properly implements all safety gates from previous reviews:
- ✅
PAYMENT_ENABLEDcheck (lines 1200-1202)- ✅
MAX_AUTO_PAYMENTenforcement (lines 1205-1215)- ✅ USD to BCH conversion via CoinGecko API (lines 1217-1229), fixing the unit mismatch issue
- ✅ Repo allowlisting via
check_existing_payment(lines 1246-1252)However, logging in exception handlers should use
logger.exception()to capture stack traces, and the f-string should use an explicit conversion flag.Apply this diff to improve error logging:
except Exception as e: - logger.error(f"Unable to fetch BCH price: {e}") + logger.exception("Unable to fetch BCH price") notify_admin_payment_failure(pr_data, "Unable to fetch BCH/USD rate") return # Step 1: Select BCH addressexcept Exception as e: - logger.error(f"Payment failed for PR #{pr_number}: {str(e)}") + logger.exception(f"Payment failed for PR #{pr_number}: {e!s}") notify_admin_payment_failure(pr_data, str(e))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
website/views/user.py(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
website/views/user.py
1099-1099: Undefined name created
(F821)
1226-1226: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1227-1227: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1281-1281: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1282-1282: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1282-1282: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (9)
website/views/user.py (9)
4-4: LGTM: Necessary imports for bounty payment system.The new imports support the payment automation features:
refor label parsing,Decimalfor precise currency calculations,requestsfor external API calls,transactionfor atomic database operations, andRepofor repository tracking.Also applies to: 6-6, 8-8, 19-19, 54-54
139-139: LGTM: Pythonic improvement.The change from conditional expression to
oroperator is more idiomatic while maintaining the same fallback behavior for empty usernames.
1017-1033: LGTM: Clean integration of bounty payment trigger.The enhancement correctly detects merged PRs with bounty labels and triggers automated payment processing while preserving existing badge assignment functionality.
1036-1042: LGTM: Robust bounty label parsing.The regex pattern correctly matches dollar-amount labels (e.g.,
$5,$10.50), and usingDecimalensures precise currency handling. ReturningNonefor missing bounty labels is appropriate.
1045-1058: LGTM: Clean payment delegation.The function properly delegates to the BCH payment implementation and appropriately raises
NotImplementedErrorfor unsupported payment methods, making future extension points clear.
1123-1151: LGTM: Well-structured GitHub comment notification.The function properly handles flexible amount formats, includes a blockchain explorer link for transparency, and uses appropriate timeout for the GitHub API call.
1154-1167: LGTM: Clear and actionable user notification.The email notification provides comprehensive instructions, including the specific BCH address format requirement, enabling users to quickly add payment details.
1170-1181: LGTM: Proper repo allowlisting and duplicate detection.The function correctly treats untracked repositories as ineligible for payment (returning
Trueto skip processing) and reliably detects duplicate payments via transaction IDs. This addresses the previous review concern about incomplete repo allowlisting.
1184-1191: LGTM: Essential admin error notification.The function provides admins with critical payment failure information for debugging and intervention.
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 1
github-actions
bot
removed
the
unresolved-conversations: 1
github-actions
bot
added
the
unresolved-conversations: 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
website/views/user.py (1)
1204-1215: Add error handling for MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT conversion.Line 1207 converts
MAX_AUTO_PAYMENTto Decimal without error handling. If the setting contains an invalid value, this will raise aValueErrorand crash the webhook handler.Apply this diff to add defensive error handling:
max_auto = getattr(settings, "MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT", None) if max_auto is not None: - max_auto_dec = Decimal(str(max_auto)) - if usd_amount > max_auto_dec: - logger.warning( - "USD bounty %s exceeds MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT %s; skipping autopay for PR #%s", - usd_amount, - max_auto_dec, - pr_data["number"], - ) - return + try: + max_auto_dec = Decimal(str(max_auto)) + except (ValueError, TypeError, ArithmeticError) as e: + logger.error("Invalid MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT=%r; skipping autopay: %s", max_auto, e) + return + if usd_amount > max_auto_dec: + logger.warning( + "USD bounty %s exceeds MAX_AUTO_PAYMENT %s; skipping autopay for PR #%s", + usd_amount, + max_auto_dec, + pr_data["number"], + ) + return
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
website/views/user.py (1)
1036-1042: Suggestion: Document behavior when multiple bounty labels exist.The function returns the first matching bounty label. If multiple labels like
$5and$10are present, only the first is processed. Consider documenting this behavior or adding validation to prevent multiple bounty labels.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
website/views/user.py(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
website/views/user.py
1226-1226: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1227-1227: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1281-1281: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
1282-1282: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error
Replace with exception
(TRY400)
1282-1282: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (5)
website/views/user.py (5)
1017-1033: LGTM! Bounty detection and payment triggering implemented correctly.The enhancement properly integrates bounty payment into the PR merge workflow, with appropriate safety gates handled in
process_bounty_payment.
1045-1058: LGTM! Clean payment abstraction.The function provides a good abstraction layer for future payment methods while currently supporting BCH.
1061-1121: LGTM! Payment recording is robust.The function properly:
- Validates repo tracking before recording
- Uses atomic transactions to prevent partial writes
- Handles Decimal arithmetic safely
- Logs exceptions with stack traces
All issues from previous reviews have been addressed.
1123-1151: LGTM! PR comment notification implemented correctly.The function posts clear payment confirmation with transaction details. The timeout parameter prevents hanging on slow responses.
1154-1191: LGTM! Notification helpers are well-implemented.The helper functions properly handle:
- User notifications for missing payment addresses
- Duplicate payment prevention with correct repo allowlisting
- Admin alerts for payment failures
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 1
github-actions
bot
added
unresolved-conversations: 0
|
Ahhh, this seems to have a few problems.
I think a more security critical review is required on this, maybe ping @DonnieBLT as well so he can take a look and tell you better. |
2 participants
Closes #3746
This update introduces a fully automated bounty payout workflow triggered when a pull request is merged.
Key features include:
Automatic detection of bounty labels (e.g., $5, $10)
BCH-based payout processing with secure address validation
Duplicate payment prevention
GitHub PR comment notifications with transaction details
email alerts for missing payment addresses
proper logging and error handling
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores