Docs/ios crackme level2 bug fix #3668
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Update MASTG-APP-0026.md with comprehensive known issues section - Add specific testing guidance to MASTG-TEST-0089.md - Document workaround guidelines for 32-bit vs 64-bit analysis - Include reference to main repository issue commjoen/uncrackable_app#10 - Provide troubleshooting steps for users affected by the bug Fixes documentation gap for iOS CrackMe Level 2 anti-debugging validation issue
- Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement - Enforced by new lint rule in .markdownlint.jsonc
- Changed @MASTG-TOOL-0038 and @MASTG-TOOL-0106 to @MASTG-TECH-0044 - Changed @MASTG-TOOL-0129 to @MASTG-TECH-0078 - Changed @MASTG-TOOL-0036 to @MASTG-TECH-0096 - Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
…iles iOS Files Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0091: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0031, @MASTG-TOOL-0139, @MASTG-TOOL-0066 with @MASTG-TECH-0079 - MASTG-TEST-0081: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0114 with @MASTG-TECH-0075 Android Files Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0011: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0038, @MASTG-TOOL-0106 with @MASTG-TECH-0044 - MASTG-TEST-0011: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0129 with @MASTG-TECH-0078 - MASTG-TEST-0011: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0036 with @MASTG-TECH-0096 Total fixed: 6 more references (11 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
…iles iOS Files Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0052: Replaced 2x @MASTG-TOOL-0038 with @MASTG-TECH-0053 - MASTG-TEST-0068: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0038 with @MASTG-TECH-0064 - MASTG-TEST-0075: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0129 with @MASTG-TECH-0078 Total fixed: 4 more references (15 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
- MASTG-TEST-0076: Fixed 3x @MASTG-TOOL-0129 → @MASTG-TECH-0078 - Total fixed: 3 more references (18 total so far) - Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
…rm test files iOS Files Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0077: Replaced 2x @MASTG-TOOL-0129 with @MASTG-TECH-0078 - MASTG-TEST-0071: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0129 with @MASTG-TECH-0078 - MASTG-TEST-0071: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0038 with @MASTG-TECH-0053 Total fixed: 3 more references (21 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
Android File Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0028: Replaced 2x @MASTG-TOOL-0004 with @MASTG-TECH-0001 - MASTG-TEST-0028: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0018 with @MASTG-TECH-0014 - MASTG-TEST-0028: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0031 with @MASTG-TECH-0079 Total fixed: 5 more references (26 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
Android File Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0029: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0035 with @MASTG-TECH-0014 - MASTG-TEST-0029: Replaced 4x @MASTG-TOOL-0018 with @MASTG-TECH-0014 Total fixed: 5 more references (31 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
…nce test files Android Files Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0045: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0142 with @MASTG-TECH-0086 - MASTG-TEST-0048: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0031, @MASTG-TOOL-0027 with @MASTG-TECH-0079 - MASTG-TEST-0051: Replaced 2x @MASTG-TOOL-0009 with @MASTG-TECH-0087 Total fixed: 4 more references (35 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
Android File Fixed: - MASTG-TEST-0039: Replaced @MASTG-TOOL-0018 with @MASTG-TECH-0014 Total fixed: 1 more reference (36 total so far) Aligns with mastg-test.instructions.md requirement
… attacks testing - Added comprehensive documentation for Android 16's new accessibilityDataSensitive flag - Included implementation examples for View-based and Jetpack Compose apps - Added testing recommendations for the new protection mechanism - Updated MASTG-TEST-0035 with latest Android security best practices - Addresses partial occlusion scenarios with system-level protection References: - https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2025/12/enhancing-android-security-stop-malware.html - https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/risks/tapjacking#mitigations
|
Thank you for your contribution! However, this PR does not reference any issues. To contribute to this project, please:
Please reopen this PR once you have linked it to an issue you are assigned to. |
|
Automated moderation result. Verdict, ai-gen-needs-review. Reasons. Evidence.
Suggested action, Request further justification for the changes and review evidence of AI use. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR closes #issue_number
Description
Briefly describe what changed and why. Reference the related issue where applicable.
AI Tool Disclosure
Check exactly one option.
If AI tools were used to generate or substantially modify code or text, complete the following.
For first-time contributors using AI tools.
Undisclosed use of AI tools will result in the PR being closed. Large rewrites or bulk changes generated by AI require explicit prior approval from the maintainers. Learn more in "Use of AI tools in contributions".
Contributor Checklist
Relevant documentation.
Contributors are expected to understand basic git and GitHub workflows, including forks, branches, commits, and pull requests. The project does not provide training. Pull requests that do not meet these minimum requirements may be closed without review.