Skip to content

Conversation

@Octobob
Copy link
Member

@Octobob Octobob commented Jan 6, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.51.08.52.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.51.08.52.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.52.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin-internal: [no-multiple-lines-of-errors] add rule (#​11899)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] detect @​@​toPrimitive and valueOf (#​11901)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-useless-default-assignment] handle conditional initializer (#​11908)
❤️ Thank You
  • Josh Goldberg ✨
  • Ulrich Stark

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.52.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@Octobob Octobob requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2026 03:54
@Octobob Octobob force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 0ba2451 to 52c5150 Compare January 11, 2026 04:04
@Octobob Octobob force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 52c5150 to a61c880 Compare January 12, 2026 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants