Skip to content

Conversation

@guowei0105
Copy link
Contributor

@guowei0105 guowei0105 commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved session and passphrase state handling for device initialization and unlock processes.
    • Simplified logic for session management across device features and authentication flows.
    • Removed redundant session start calls after device unlock events, streamlining user authentication and device access.

@guowei0105 guowei0105 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 23, 2025 14:42
@revan-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

revan-zhang commented Jul 23, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

lihuanhuan
lihuanhuan previously approved these changes Jul 24, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

Calls to storage.cache.start_session() were removed from multiple async functions across the codebase. The handle_Initialize function was refactored to simplify session start conditions and passphrase handling. Function signatures and main control flows remain unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
core/src/apps/base.py Refactored handle_Initialize; removed storage.cache.start_session() calls.
core/src/apps/homescreen/lockscreen.py Removed storage.cache.start_session() call after unlock.
core/src/apps/webauthn/fido2.py Removed imports and calls to storage.cache.start_session() in two async functions.
core/src/boot.py Removed storage.cache.start_session() call in bootscreen.
core/src/trezor/uart.py Removed imports and calls to storage.cache.start_session() in two async functions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
core/src/apps/base.py (1)

266-271: Combine if branches for cleaner code.

Both branches call the same function. Combine them.

-    if passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(
-        passphrase_state
-    ):
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
-    elif has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None:
+    if (passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(passphrase_state)) or (has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None):
         session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4fc4980 and 80950ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • core/src/apps/base.py (1 hunks)
  • core/src/apps/homescreen/lockscreen.py (0 hunks)
  • core/src/apps/webauthn/fido2.py (0 hunks)
  • core/src/boot.py (0 hunks)
  • core/src/trezor/uart.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • core/src/apps/homescreen/lockscreen.py
  • core/src/boot.py
  • core/src/trezor/uart.py
  • core/src/apps/webauthn/fido2.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
core/src/apps/base.py

266-271: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Gen check
  • GitHub Check: Style check
  • GitHub Check: Defs check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
core/src/apps/base.py (2)

250-252: Variable extraction improves readability.

Clean refactor that makes the code easier to follow.


257-263: Type handling is thorough and defensive.

Good improvement for handling different passphrase_state types.

lihuanhuan
lihuanhuan previously approved these changes Jul 24, 2025
Lu1zz
Lu1zz previously approved these changes Jul 24, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
core/src/apps/base.py (1)

266-271: Consider combining if branches.

Both conditions call start_session() without arguments.

-    if passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(
-        passphrase_state
-    ):
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
-    elif has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None:
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
+    if (passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(passphrase_state)) or (has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None):
+        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80950ec and 9618f46.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/src/apps/base.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
core/src/apps/base.py

266-271: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Gen check
  • GitHub Check: Defs check
  • GitHub Check: Style check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
core/src/apps/base.py (2)

250-252: Good refactor for readability.

Extracting the condition to has_attach improves code clarity.


257-263: Robust type handling.

The passphrase state extraction properly handles bytes, strings, and other types.

@guowei0105 guowei0105 dismissed stale reviews from lihuanhuan and Lu1zz via c8b8f50 July 24, 2025 05:01
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
core/src/apps/base.py (1)

265-274: Combine if branches as suggested by static analysis.

The logic can be simplified by combining the conditions.

-    session_id_in_msg = getattr(msg, "session_id", None)
-    if passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(
-        passphrase_state
-    ):
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
-    elif has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None:
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
-    else:
-        session_id = storage.cache.start_session(session_id_in_msg)
+    session_id_in_msg = getattr(msg, "session_id", None)
+    if (passphrase_state and se_thd89.check_passphrase_btc_test_address(passphrase_state)) or (has_attach and session_id_in_msg is not None and passphrase_state is None):
+        session_id = storage.cache.start_session()
+    else:
+        session_id = storage.cache.start_session(session_id_in_msg)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8b8f50 and 2e35f76.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/src/apps/base.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
core/src/apps/base.py

266-271: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Gen check
  • GitHub Check: Defs check
  • GitHub Check: Style check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
core/src/apps/base.py (1)

250-264: Improve passphrase state extraction robustness.

The new logic handles both bytes and string types for passphrase_state, which is good defensive programming.

@guowei0105 guowei0105 merged commit 759821e into OneKeyHQ:main Jul 24, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants