-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Open
Description
Background
Current Protocols define ChemicalSystems for stateA and stateB in the following manner:
The ask
We want to align how we define states for Protocols so that we have a consister manner of pull out relative and absolute transformations from AlchemicalNetworks.
The move recently has been to promote how SepTop & AFEs do it, but we should discuss how we want to do things going forward.
The questions
- Is the SepTop & ABFE definition suitable?
- Are there any issues with them (performance, comprehension, etc...)?
- What other ways could we define the end states?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Labels
No labels