Fix LiteLLM cost tracking for provider-prefixed models#2257
Merged
enyst merged 1 commit intoOpenHands:mainfrom Mar 2, 2026
Merged
Fix LiteLLM cost tracking for provider-prefixed models#2257enyst merged 1 commit intoOpenHands:mainfrom
enyst merged 1 commit intoOpenHands:mainfrom
Conversation
enyst
reviewed
Mar 2, 2026
enyst
reviewed
Mar 2, 2026
Collaborator
enyst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you! Litellm can be unexpected sometimes, LLMs do have "provider/model" names so it's doing the split itself in the regular completion method... but maybe not in completion_cost? I set off OpenHands agent to take a look too 😅
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes missing cost tracking in
Conversation.run()when using provider-prefixed model names (e.g.vertex_ai/claude-sonnet-4-5@...,azure/gpt-5.2-chat).Previously, telemetry’s LiteLLM cost fallback stripped the provider and passed only the bare model name to
litellm_completion_cost(), causing LiteLLM to warn“LLM Provider NOT provided”and return None for cost. This PR preserves the provider by passingcustom_llm_provider=<provider>andmodel=<bare_model>to LiteLLM’s cost calculator.Also adds regression tests to ensure provider and model are propagated correctly for cost calculation.
[fill in a summary of this PR]
Checklist