Prototype / early discussion for enabling incremental build for installFeature#811
Draft
scottkurz wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenLiberty:mainfrom
Draft
Prototype / early discussion for enabling incremental build for installFeature#811scottkurz wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenLiberty:mainfrom
scottkurz wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenLiberty:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Scott Kurz <skurz@us.ibm.com>
scottkurz
force-pushed
the
incr-experiment-1
branch
from
582ffe8 to
d597cbe
Compare
scottkurz
changed the title
scottkurz
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an attempt to advance a bit the idea in #649 in public. So I'll link with the "Fixes #649" comment
This oversimplifies the full scope of the installFeature task.
It uses the install lib/features as the output dir and it uses the
io.openliberty.tools.gradle.tasks.AbstractFeatureTask.getSpecifiedFeatures(String)as the input (which doesn't capture all possible cases, I know).Putting it out here to help the discussion.
EXTRA NOTE
Though not really related, also noting I regularly (with and without this PR) see a re-run of libertyCreate with message: