Skip to content

Conversation

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon commented Jun 15, 2025

Related #216

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • The health check endpoint now includes the application's name and version in its response.
  • Documentation
    • Updated the API documentation to reflect the new response fields for the health check endpoint.
  • Tests
    • Enhanced tests to verify that the health check endpoint returns the correct name and version values.

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon self-assigned this Jun 15, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The health check endpoint /api/v1/__health was updated to include version and name fields in its response, sourced from package.json. Corresponding tests and the OpenAPI specification were also updated to require and validate these new response properties.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js Enhanced health check endpoint to add version and name fields in the JSON response.
src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml Updated OpenAPI spec for /__health to require and document version and name fields.
tests/httpServer/apiV1.test.js Extended health endpoint test to assert presence and correctness of version and name.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant APIv1 Router
    participant package.json

    Client->>APIv1 Router: GET /api/v1/__health
    APIv1 Router->>package.json: Read name, version
    APIv1 Router-->>Client: JSON { status, timestamp, name, version }
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Include HTTP API backbone  #221: Initially introduced the health check endpoint and its basic tests, which this PR extends by adding version and name fields.

Poem

A bunny hopped to check the health,
Now finds the name and version as well.
With specs and tests all up to date,
This endpoint’s future looks quite great!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)

2-2: Consider centralising package.json metadata import
Multiple modules/tests now require('../../../package.json'). Duplicating the relative-path dance is brittle (any move of this file breaks the path) and complicates bundling.
Create a tiny helper, e.g. src/utils/pkg.js, that exports { name, version } once and reuse it everywhere.

-const pkg = require('../../../package.json')
+const { name, version } = require('../../utils/pkg')
__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2)

3-3: Mirror helper usage in tests once refactor is applied
If you adopt the suggested utils/pkg helper, import it here too to keep test paths resilient:

-const pkg = require('../../package.json')
+const { name, version } = require('../../src/utils/pkg')

39-40: Assertion order / explicitness nitpick
To avoid a false positive where the endpoint returns the right keys but wrong values, assert both fields together:

-expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('version', pkg.version)
-expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('name', pkg.name)
+expect(response.body).toMatchObject({ version: pkg.version, name: pkg.name })

Purely stylistic; feel free to ignore.

src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (2)

31-36: Example values drift risk
example: 1.0.0 and visionboard are now hard-coded. As soon as the real package version changes, the example becomes outdated.
Either reference the real value during the CI build (e.g. through a templating step) or use a placeholder like x.y.z to avoid stale docs.


37-42: Required list already enforces presence – consider property ordering
additionalProperties: false plus required is good.
Minor: keep the required array alphabetically sorted (name, status, timestamp, version) to reduce merge conflicts and improve diff readability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 42-42: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8068255 and b807664.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • __tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)
__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2)
  • pkg (3-3)
  • require (2-2)
__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (1)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (3)
  • pkg (2-2)
  • require (1-1)
  • require (3-3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Playwright Tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)

8-10: Publicly exposing version may aid reconnaissance
Returning the exact package.json version helps users, but also gives attackers an easy fingerprint of the running code.
If external consumers don’t strictly need it, consider hiding the patch component (e.g. 1.2.x) or gating the full value behind authentication.

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon merged commit 68ec9d0 into main Jun 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon deleted the ulises/v1-health branch June 15, 2025 12:39
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Jun 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants